PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBLTX vs. PDBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBLTX vs. PDBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBLTX achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly higher than PDBAX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLTX has underperformed PDBAX with an annualized return of 1.62%, while PDBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.08% annualized return.


DBLTX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.69%
6M
-0.81%
YTD
-0.46%
1Y
2.38%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
1.62%
ALL TIME*
3.44%

PDBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.33%
6M
-0.97%
YTD
-0.70%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
2.08%
ALL TIME*
4.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DBLTX vs. PDBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBLTX
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I
-0.46%8.05%3.08%5.34%-12.56%0.24%4.13%5.81%1.76%3.80%
PDBAX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund
-0.70%7.50%1.82%6.51%-14.52%-1.77%7.78%14.71%-0.97%6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DBLTX and PDBAX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010

0.83

The correlation between DBLTX and PDBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.93 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBLTX vs. PDBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DBLTX
DBLTX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DBLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBAX
PDBAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PDBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DBLTX vs. PDBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBLTXPDBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.13

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.05

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

2.56

-0.07

DBLTX vs. PDBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBLTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the PDBAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBLTX and PDBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBLTX vs. PDBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBLTX drawdown since its inception was -16.49%, smaller than the maximum PDBAX drawdown of -21.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLTX and PDBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBLTXPDBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.49%

-21.24%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-3.07%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.33%

-5.25%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.49%

-20.96%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.49%

-21.24%

+4.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-2.80%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-2.47%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.26%

+0.06%

Volatility

DBLTX vs. PDBAX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) have volatilities of 1.05% and 1.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBLTXPDBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.05%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

3.52%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80%

4.29%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

6.04%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.42%

5.36%

-0.94%

DBLTX vs. PDBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBLTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBAX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBLTX vs. PDBAX - Dividend Comparison

DBLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than PDBAX's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLTX
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I
4.52%4.86%5.03%4.35%3.86%3.12%3.39%3.66%3.74%3.65%3.72%4.11%
PDBAX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund
3.98%4.27%3.76%3.55%5.49%2.47%2.68%10.32%3.74%2.60%3.65%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBLTX and PDBAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBAX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to DBLTX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLTX dropped -16.49% vs PDBAX's -21.24%.

DBLTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBLTX and PDBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer