DBLTX vs. FBND
DBLTX (DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both funds - DBLTX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by DoubleLine, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, DBLTX returned 1.71%/yr vs 2.54%/yr for FBND. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBLTX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
DBLTX vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBLTX achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, DBLTX has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 1.71%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.54% annualized return.
DBLTX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
FBND
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 2.54%
DBLTX vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | -0.22% | 8.05% | 3.08% | 5.34% | -12.56% | 0.24% | 4.13% | 5.81% | 1.76% | 3.80% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.72% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBLTX and FBND is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014 | 0.81 |
The correlation between DBLTX and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBLTX vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
DBLTX
FBND
DBLTX vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBLTX | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.77 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.71 | 5.07 | -1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBLTX vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBLTX drawdown since its inception was -16.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBLTX and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBLTX | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.49% | -17.25% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.17% | -2.66% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.59% | -5.94% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.49% | -17.25% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.49% | -17.25% | +0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -1.21% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -3.34% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 0.93% | +0.21% |
Volatility
DBLTX vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) have volatilities of 1.12% and 1.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBLTX | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 1.13% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 2.84% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81% | 3.83% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 5.93% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 6.10% | -1.68% |
DBLTX vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBLTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBLTX vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
DBLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than FBND's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBLTX DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 4.90% | 4.86% | 5.03% | 4.35% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 3.39% | 3.66% | 3.74% | 3.65% | 3.72% | 4.11% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.69% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DBLTX and FBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FBND has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to DBLTX (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBLTX dropped -16.49% vs FBND's -17.25%.
FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBLTX and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer