PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTCH.AS vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTCH.AS vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WTCH.AS is traded in EUR, while VYM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VYM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTCH.AS achieves a 25.44% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, WTCH.AS has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 23.98%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.59% annualized return.


WTCH.AS

1D
-1.95%
1M
14.84%
YTD
25.44%
6M
23.94%
1Y
48.66%
3Y*
29.25%
5Y*
22.49%
10Y*
23.98%

VYM

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.29%
YTD
13.70%
6M
12.22%
1Y
24.49%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTCH.AS vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTCH.AS
SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF
25.44%8.41%43.39%49.09%-27.66%40.88%31.79%49.43%1.91%21.26%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
13.70%1.73%25.36%3.38%5.74%35.64%-7.19%26.87%-1.51%2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between WTCH.AS and VYM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.35

The correlation between WTCH.AS and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTCH.AS vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTCH.AS
WTCH.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTCH.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTCH.AS vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTCH.ASVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

5.07

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.10

17.44

-9.34

WTCH.AS vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTCH.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTCH.AS and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTCH.ASVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.28

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.88

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

0.68

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.54

+0.60

Drawdowns

WTCH.AS vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTCH.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -51.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTCH.AS and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTCH.ASVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.28%

-51.83%

+20.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.67%

-4.85%

-10.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.06%

-19.91%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.06%

-19.91%

-10.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.28%

-34.24%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-0.34%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-8.16%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

1.41%

+4.55%

Volatility

WTCH.AS vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF (WTCH.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.67%. This indicates that WTCH.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTCH.ASVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

2.67%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

7.83%

+6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.28%

10.81%

+9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

14.22%

+8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.39%

17.08%

+4.31%

WTCH.AS vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTCH.AS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTCH.AS vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

WTCH.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%
WTCH.AS
SPDR MSCI World Technology UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WTCH.AS and VYM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WTCH.AS.

WTCH.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while VYM is Dividend. WTCH.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WTCH.AS and 0.04% for VYM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTCH.AS and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer