PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSM vs. ENB-PP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WSM vs. ENB-PP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB-PP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WSM is traded in USD, while ENB-PP.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ENB-PP.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 26.06% return, which is significantly higher than ENB-PP.TO's 7.63% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has outperformed ENB-PP.TO with an annualized return of 27.10%, while ENB-PP.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.54% annualized return.


WSM

1D
2.19%
1M
28.73%
YTD
26.06%
6M
20.02%
1Y
47.32%
3Y*
53.75%
5Y*
23.70%
10Y*
27.10%

ENB-PP.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
7.63%
6M
10.07%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSM vs. ENB-PP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
26.06%-2.09%86.56%80.24%-30.49%68.60%42.38%50.07%0.61%10.20%
ENB-PP.TO
Enbridge Inc.
7.63%24.97%20.28%17.54%-22.53%44.86%-1.66%11.22%-22.43%28.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WSM and ENB-PP.TO is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2012

0.10

The correlation between WSM and ENB-PP.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSM vs. ENB-PP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSM
WSM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
WSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
WSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ENB-PP.TO
ENB-PP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ENB-PP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENB-PP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENB-PP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ENB-PP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENB-PP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSM vs. ENB-PP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Enbridge Inc. (ENB-PP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSMENB-PP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.47

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

4.82

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

14.65

-10.10

WSM vs. ENB-PP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the ENB-PP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSM and ENB-PP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSM vs. ENB-PP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than ENB-PP.TO's maximum drawdown of -64.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and ENB-PP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSMENB-PP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.01%

-64.12%

-24.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.27%

-4.70%

-18.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.79%

-10.26%

-26.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.92%

-33.10%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.71%

-57.82%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.81%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.03%

-21.31%

-3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.25%

1.54%

+8.71%

Volatility

WSM vs. ENB-PP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Enbridge Inc. (ENB-PP.TO) at 1.87%. This indicates that WSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENB-PP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSMENB-PP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.02%

1.87%

+10.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.57%

5.85%

+19.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.63%

8.81%

+25.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.77%

14.48%

+30.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.26%

19.01%

+25.25%

Dividends

WSM vs. ENB-PP.TO - Dividend Comparison

WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than ENB-PP.TO's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENB-PP.TO
Enbridge Inc.
6.15%6.55%6.81%6.54%5.26%4.14%7.62%6.60%6.15%4.92%5.59%5.93%
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.23%1.43%1.16%1.72%2.65%1.43%1.93%2.55%3.33%2.98%3.02%2.36%

Financials

WSM vs. ENB-PP.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Enbridge Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B2.40B2.60B20222023202420252026
1.81B
(WSM) Total Revenue
(ENB-PP.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WSM values in USD, ENB-PP.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


WSM and ENB-PP.TO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSM and ENB-PP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer