WSC vs. HAL
WSC (WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp.) and HAL (Halliburton Company) are both stocks. WSC operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials), while HAL operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy). Over the past 5 years, WSC returned -1.09%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for HAL. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WSC vs. HAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSC achieves a 38.49% return, which is significantly lower than HAL's 46.51% return.
WSC
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 18.79%
- YTD
- 38.49%
- 6M
- 24.06%
- 1Y
- -5.38%
- 3Y*
- -16.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.09%
- 10Y*
- —
HAL
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- 46.51%
- 6M
- 51.11%
- 1Y
- 107.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
WSC vs. HAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSC WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. | 38.49% | -43.07% | -24.83% | -1.48% | 10.60% | 76.26% | 25.31% | 96.28% | -25.83% | 20.95% |
HAL Halliburton Company | 46.51% | 7.02% | -23.19% | -6.47% | 74.45% | 21.99% | -21.23% | -4.90% | -44.63% | 17.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSC and HAL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2017 | 0.34 |
The correlation between WSC and HAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WSC:
$4.70B
HAL:
$34.42B
WSC:
-$0.37
HAL:
$1.82
WSC:
2.08
HAL:
1.57
WSC:
5.40
HAL:
3.18
WSC:
$2.27B
HAL:
$22.17B
WSC:
$1.10B
HAL:
$3.40B
WSC:
$410.10M
HAL:
$3.83B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSC vs. HAL — Risk / Return Rank
WSC
HAL
WSC vs. HAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. (WSC) and Halliburton Company (HAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WSC | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 2.95 | -3.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.23 | 3.67 | -3.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.44 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 8.23 | -8.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | 21.47 | -21.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WSC | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 2.95 | -3.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.32 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.14 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
WSC vs. HAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSC drawdown since its inception was -71.54%, smaller than the maximum HAL drawdown of -92.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSC and HAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSC | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.54% | -92.99% | +21.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.53% | -13.10% | -39.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.72% | -54.01% | -16.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.54% | -54.01% | -17.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -91.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.28% | -30.46% | -19.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.74% | -39.13% | +18.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.08% | 5.01% | +25.07% |
Volatility
WSC vs. HAL - Volatility Comparison
WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. (WSC) has a higher volatility of 23.55% compared to Halliburton Company (HAL) at 9.25%. This indicates that WSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSC | HAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.55% | 9.25% | +14.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.52% | 23.53% | +14.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.92% | 36.57% | +15.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.12% | 40.11% | +1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.36% | 45.96% | -1.60% |
Dividends
WSC vs. HAL - Dividend Comparison
WSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than HAL's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAL Halliburton Company | 2.07% | 2.41% | 2.50% | 1.77% | 1.22% | 0.79% | 1.67% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 2.12% |
WSC WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. | 1.35% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
WSC vs. HAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. and Halliburton Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WSC vs. HAL - Profitability Comparison
WSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 285.68M and revenue of 548.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.1%.
HAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a gross profit of 790.00M and revenue of 5.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.6%.
WSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 96.66M and revenue of 548.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
HAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported an operating income of 679.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
WSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 28.12M and revenue of 548.63M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
HAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Halliburton Company reported a net income of 461.00M and revenue of 5.40B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WSC and HAL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WSC has higher volatility (23.55%) compared to HAL (9.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSC dropped -71.54% vs HAL's -92.99%.
HAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WSC and HAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer