WRTH vs. AMDW
WRTH (Worth Charting Options Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. WRTH charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.
Performance
WRTH vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WRTH
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- 6M
- 168.13%
- YTD
- 181.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRTH vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF | 3.25% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 70.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRTH and AMDW is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRTH vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worth Charting Options Income ETF (WRTH) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WRTH vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRTH drawdown since its inception was -6.20%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRTH and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRTH | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -34.64% | +28.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -10.40% | +5.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -13.84% | +12.54% |
Volatility
WRTH vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRTH | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.58% | 83.47% | -64.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 83.47% | -64.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 83.47% | -64.89% |
WRTH vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRTH has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
WRTH vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
WRTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than AMDW's 42.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 42.69% | 34.78% |
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF | 1.61% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WRTH and AMDW have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for WRTH.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 42.69%, compared with 1.61% for WRTH.
They also come from different issuers: Worth Charting and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for WRTH and 0.99% for AMDW.
Find the right allocation for WRTH and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer