WRTH vs. ARMW
WRTH (Worth Charting Options Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. WRTH charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
WRTH vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WRTH
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -38.97%
- 6M
- 199.70%
- YTD
- 182.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRTH vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF | 3.25% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 29.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRTH and ARMW is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRTH vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worth Charting Options Income ETF (WRTH) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WRTH vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRTH drawdown since its inception was -6.20%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRTH and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRTH | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -48.47% | +42.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -43.15% | +38.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -25.84% | +24.54% |
Volatility
WRTH vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRTH | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.58% | 95.02% | -76.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 95.02% | -76.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 95.02% | -76.44% |
WRTH vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRTH has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
WRTH vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
WRTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than ARMW's 46.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 46.80% | 16.38% |
WRTH Worth Charting Options Income ETF | 1.61% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WRTH and ARMW have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for WRTH.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 46.80%, compared with 1.61% for WRTH.
They also come from different issuers: Worth Charting and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for WRTH and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for WRTH and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer