WRND vs. POW
WRND (IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WRND is a Global Equities fund tracking the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Net, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. WRND is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WRND charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
WRND vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRND achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.
WRND
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POW
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- 6M
- 31.71%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRND vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | 12.50% | -1.35% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.93% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRND and POW is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRND vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
WRND
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WRND vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WRND | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WRND vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRND drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRND and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRND | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -18.37% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.86% | -18.37% | +14.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.91% | -4.33% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | — | — |
Volatility
WRND vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRND | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.27% | 32.94% | -14.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 32.94% | -13.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 32.94% | -13.99% |
WRND vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WRND vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
WRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | 0.93% | 1.29% | 1.15% | 2.06% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WRND and POW have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WRND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WRND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
WRND has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
WRND is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WRND and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for WRND and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer