WRND vs. CGDG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG).

WRND and CGDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WRND is a passively managed fund by IndexIQ that tracks the performance of the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Feb 8, 2022. CGDG is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023.

Performance

WRND vs. CGDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WRND vs. CGDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF	-3.11%	27.72%	13.46%	10.04%
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	1.13%	22.74%	11.52%	9.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRND achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than CGDG's 1.13% return.

WRND

• 1D: 4.07%
• 1M: -6.90%
• YTD: -3.11%
• 6M: -0.04%
• 1Y: 22.97%
• 3Y*: 17.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDG

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -4.90%
• YTD: 1.13%
• 6M: 4.55%
• 1Y: 18.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRND vs. CGDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDG's 0.47% expense ratio.

CGDG

Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF

WRND

IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF

Return for Risk

WRND vs. CGDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRND

WRND Risk / Return Rank: 65
WRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
WRND Omega Ratio Rank: 62
WRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
WRND Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CGDG

CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 77
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRND vs. CGDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRND	CGDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.32	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.88	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.27	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.91	-0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	8.70	-1.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRND vs. CGDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRND Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the CGDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRND and CGDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRND	CGDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	1.32	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	1.49	-0.91

Correlation

The correlation between WRND and CGDG is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

WRND vs. CGDG - Dividend Comparison

WRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than CGDG's 1.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF	1.18%	1.29%	1.15%	2.06%	2.06%
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	1.95%	1.95%	2.15%	0.39%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WRND vs. CGDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRND drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, which is greater than CGDG's maximum drawdown of -10.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRND and CGDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRND	CGDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.16%	-10.52%	-16.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.75%	-9.90%	-2.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.87%	-5.03%	-3.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-1.28%	-4.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	2.17%	+1.09%

Volatility

WRND vs. CGDG - Volatility Comparison

IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) at 4.93%. This indicates that WRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRND	CGDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	4.93%	+3.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.20%	8.32%	+4.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.59%	14.10%	+6.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.78%	12.23%	+6.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.78%	12.23%	+6.55%