WRLD vs. GSLC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WRLD (World Acceptance Corporation) is a stock, while GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. Over the past 10 years, WRLD returned 15.02%/yr vs 14.64%/yr for GSLC. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WRLD vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRLD achieves a 18.39% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC's 8.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WRLD having a 15.02% annualized return and GSLC not far behind at 14.64%.

WRLD

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 18.24%
• YTD: 18.39%
• 6M: 4.40%
• 1Y: 5.68%
• 3Y*: 12.34%
• 5Y*: 1.75%
• 10Y*: 15.02%

GSLC

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 8.50%
• 6M: 8.90%
• 1Y: 23.28%
• 3Y*: 20.85%
• 5Y*: 12.70%
• 10Y*: 14.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRLD vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WRLD World Acceptance Corporation	18.39%	24.86%	-13.86%	97.95%	-73.13%	140.10%	18.31%	-15.51%	26.68%	25.58%
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	8.50%	16.17%	24.21%	25.09%	-18.71%	27.17%	19.02%	30.74%	-4.07%	22.49%

Correlation

The correlation between WRLD and GSLC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015	0.44

The correlation between WRLD and GSLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WRLD vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRLD

WRLD Risk / Return Rank: 43
WRLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
WRLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
WRLD Omega Ratio Rank: 42
WRLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
WRLD Martin Ratio Rank: 44

GSLC

GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 56
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 58
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRLD vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRLD	GSLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	2.00	-1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	2.76	-2.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.36	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	2.46	-2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.30	10.96	-10.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRLD vs. GSLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the GSLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRLD and GSLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRLD	GSLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12	2.00	-1.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	0.77	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.83	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.82	-0.57

Drawdowns

WRLD vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRLD drawdown since its inception was -77.65%, which is greater than GSLC's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRLD and GSLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRLD	GSLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.65%	-33.69%	-43.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.34%	-9.49%	-27.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.37%	-18.66%	-20.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.00%	-24.90%	-52.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.00%	-33.69%	-43.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.83%	-0.67%	-35.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.22%	-4.39%	-28.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.90%	2.13%	+16.77%

Volatility

WRLD vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison

World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) has a higher volatility of 8.34% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) at 2.74%. This indicates that WRLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRLD	GSLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.34%	2.74%	+5.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.13%	8.84%	+28.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.82%	11.72%	+37.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.11%	16.62%	+38.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.21%	17.68%	+37.53%

Dividends

WRLD vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison

WRLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	0.93%	1.00%	1.11%	1.38%	1.61%	1.06%	1.35%	1.54%	1.89%	1.69%	1.69%	0.36%
WRLD World Acceptance Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRLD and GSLC in my portfolio?

WRLD and GSLC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRLD or GSLC?

WRLD has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to GSLC (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRLD dropped -77.65% vs GSLC's -33.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.