WRB vs. PCN

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

WRB (W. R. Berkley Corporation) is a stock, while PCN (PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund) is Multisector Bonds fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, WRB returned 17.92%/yr vs 7.31%/yr for PCN. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WRB vs. PCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has outperformed PCN with an annualized return of 17.92%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.

WRB

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 2.74%
• YTD: -2.51%
• 6M: 0.17%
• 1Y: -4.36%
• 3Y*: 24.41%
• 5Y*: 17.90%
• 10Y*: 17.92%

PCN

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: -3.20%
• 6M: -0.94%
• 1Y: 4.06%
• 3Y*: 8.59%
• 5Y*: 0.74%
• 10Y*: 7.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRB vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation	-2.51%	23.02%	27.19%	0.25%	33.92%	27.39%	-3.14%	43.80%	5.96%	10.21%
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	-3.20%	5.55%	19.52%	16.22%	-22.88%	6.93%	-2.19%	39.10%	-5.94%	26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between WRB and PCN is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2001	0.18

The correlation between WRB and PCN shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WRB vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRB

WRB Risk / Return Rank: 31
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 28
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 33

PCN

PCN Risk / Return Rank: 7
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRB vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WRB	PCN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	0.31	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	0.51	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.07	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	0.29	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.54	0.81	-1.35

WRB vs. PCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRB Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the PCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRB and PCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WRB vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.33%, which is greater than PCN's maximum drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and PCN.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRB	PCN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.33%	-61.12%	-8.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.62%	-10.40%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.62%	-22.53%	+4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.29%	-33.39%	+7.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.35%	-50.27%	+4.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.49%	-5.72%	-5.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.58%	-7.20%	-7.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.29%	3.70%	+5.59%

Volatility

WRB vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison

W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) at 2.95%. This indicates that WRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRB	PCN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.63%	2.95%	+4.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	7.19%	+7.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.37%	9.77%	+11.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.83%	16.19%	+6.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.56%	21.94%	+2.62%

Dividends

WRB vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison

WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than PCN's 11.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	11.55%	10.58%	10.06%	10.88%	12.66%	7.89%	7.83%	7.37%	9.60%	7.85%	11.98%	10.22%
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation	2.72%	2.64%	2.39%	2.73%	1.22%	2.44%	0.71%	2.43%	2.83%	2.16%	2.27%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRB and PCN in my portfolio?

WRB and PCN have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRB or PCN?

WRB has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to PCN (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRB dropped -69.33% vs PCN's -61.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.