WRB vs. CSQ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

WRB (W. R. Berkley Corporation) is a stock, while CSQ (Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund) is Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Calamos. Over the past 10 years, WRB returned 17.92%/yr vs 16.38%/yr for CSQ. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WRB vs. CSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRB achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly lower than CSQ's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, WRB has outperformed CSQ with an annualized return of 17.92%, while CSQ has yielded a comparatively lower 16.38% annualized return.

WRB

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 2.74%
• YTD: -2.51%
• 6M: 0.17%
• 1Y: -4.36%
• 3Y*: 24.41%
• 5Y*: 17.90%
• 10Y*: 17.92%

CSQ

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -1.20%
• YTD: 8.10%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 24.17%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 16.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRB vs. CSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation	-2.51%	23.02%	27.19%	0.25%	33.92%	27.39%	-3.14%	43.80%	5.96%	10.21%
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	8.10%	16.25%	28.11%	20.80%	-24.26%	30.77%	26.22%	38.62%	-4.89%	27.98%

Correlation

The correlation between WRB and CSQ is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2004	0.37

The correlation between WRB and CSQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WRB vs. CSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRB

WRB Risk / Return Rank: 31
WRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
WRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
WRB Omega Ratio Rank: 28
WRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
WRB Martin Ratio Rank: 33

CSQ

CSQ Risk / Return Rank: 36
CSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
CSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
CSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 41
CSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRB vs. CSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WRB	CSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	1.51	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	2.06	-2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.27	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	1.49	-1.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.54	6.36	-6.90

WRB vs. CSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRB Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the CSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRB and CSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WRB vs. CSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRB drawdown since its inception was -69.33%, roughly equal to the maximum CSQ drawdown of -67.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRB and CSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRB	CSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.33%	-67.17%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.62%	-15.25%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.62%	-24.18%	+6.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.29%	-33.09%	+6.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.35%	-48.21%	+2.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.49%	-2.35%	-9.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.58%	-9.33%	-5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.29%	3.58%	+5.71%

Volatility

WRB vs. CSQ - Volatility Comparison

W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) at 5.74%. This indicates that WRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRB	CSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.63%	5.74%	+1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	12.45%	+2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.37%	15.06%	+6.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.83%	20.06%	+2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.56%	23.02%	+1.54%

Dividends

WRB vs. CSQ - Dividend Comparison

WRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than CSQ's 6.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	6.72%	6.51%	6.95%	8.27%	9.17%	6.38%	7.03%	7.14%	9.35%	8.20%	9.64%	10.00%
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation	2.72%	2.64%	2.39%	2.73%	1.22%	2.44%	0.71%	2.43%	2.83%	2.16%	2.27%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRB and CSQ in my portfolio?

WRB and CSQ have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRB or CSQ?

WRB has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to CSQ (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRB dropped -69.33% vs CSQ's -67.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.