WRAIX vs. NLSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX).
WRAIX is managed by Wilmington Funds. It was launched on Jan 11, 2012. NLSIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Dec 28, 2011.
Performance
WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund | -2.64% | 9.13% | 7.74% | 7.73% | -3.41% | 6.52% | 1.04% | 12.34% | -2.67% | 9.75% |
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | -3.63% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 13.10% | -6.85% | 9.01% | 15.27% | 17.11% | -6.92% | 13.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRAIX achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly higher than NLSIX's -3.63% return. Over the past 10 years, WRAIX has underperformed NLSIX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while NLSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.37% annualized return.
WRAIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.68%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
NLSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- -3.63%
- 6M
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRAIX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WRAIX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank
WRAIX
NLSIX
WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRAIX | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 0.87 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.12 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 0.63 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 2.31 | +0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRAIX | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.72 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.88 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.91 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between WRAIX and NLSIX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison
WRAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than NLSIX's 0.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund | 0.18% | 0.17% | 1.47% | 1.31% | 2.77% | 0.52% | 1.98% | 1.15% | 1.25% | 1.15% | 0.30% | 2.38% |
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.97% | 7.01% | 1.13% | 2.15% | 2.39% | 5.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRAIX drawdown since its inception was -15.44%, roughly equal to the maximum NLSIX drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRAIX and NLSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRAIX | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.44% | -14.75% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.03% | -4.39% | -0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.24% | -10.79% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.44% | -14.75% | -0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -4.39% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.99% | -2.03% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 1.19% | +0.06% |
Volatility
WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) at 1.89%. This indicates that WRAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WRAIX | NLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 1.89% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.56% | 3.40% | +1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.07% | 6.34% | +1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 6.63% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 7.29% | -0.61% |