WRAIX vs. NLSIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WRAIX (Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund) and NLSIX (Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, WRAIX returned 5.38%/yr vs 6.90%/yr for NLSIX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WRAIX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for NLSIX.

Performance

WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRAIX achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than NLSIX's 1.89% return. Over the past 10 years, WRAIX has underperformed NLSIX with an annualized return of 5.38%, while NLSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.90% annualized return.

WRAIX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 3.06%
• 6M: 2.99%
• 1Y: 7.66%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 5.44%
• 10Y*: 5.38%

NLSIX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 1.89%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 6.72%
• 3Y*: 7.42%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: 6.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund	3.06%	9.13%	7.74%	7.73%	-3.41%	6.52%	1.04%	12.34%	-2.67%	9.75%
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	1.89%	7.20%	7.47%	13.10%	-6.85%	9.01%	15.27%	17.11%	-6.92%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between WRAIX and NLSIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2012	0.70

The correlation between WRAIX and NLSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WRAIX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRAIX

WRAIX Risk / Return Rank: 23
WRAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
WRAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
WRAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
WRAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
WRAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

NLSIX

NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 23
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WRAIX	NLSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.29	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.89	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.24	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	1.53	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.19	5.77	+0.42

WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the NLSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRAIX and NLSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRAIX drawdown since its inception was -15.44%, roughly equal to the maximum NLSIX drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRAIX and NLSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRAIX	NLSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.44%	-14.75%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.03%	-4.39%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.03%	-6.90%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.24%	-10.79%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.44%	-14.75%	-0.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-1.02%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-2.01%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.20%	1.16%	+0.04%

Volatility

WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison

Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) have volatilities of 2.08% and 2.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRAIX	NLSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.08%	2.14%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.06%	4.32%	+0.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.16%	5.22%	+0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.52%	6.70%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.75%	7.34%	-0.59%

WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRAIX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRAIX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison

WRAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, more than NLSIX's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	0.05%	0.05%	0.02%	0.97%	7.01%	1.13%	2.15%	2.39%	5.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund	0.17%	0.17%	1.47%	1.31%	2.77%	0.52%	1.98%	1.15%	1.25%	1.15%	0.30%	2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRAIX and NLSIX in my portfolio?

WRAIX and NLSIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRAIX or NLSIX?

NLSIX has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to WRAIX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRAIX dropped -15.44% vs NLSIX's -14.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NLSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.