PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRAIX vs. WTAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRAIX vs. WTAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRAIX achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than WTAIX's 0.88% return. Over the past 10 years, WRAIX has outperformed WTAIX with an annualized return of 5.38%, while WTAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.50% annualized return.


WRAIX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
3.06%
6M
2.99%
1Y
7.66%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
5.38%

WTAIX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.21%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.19%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
1.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRAIX vs. WTAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRAIX
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund
3.06%9.13%7.74%7.73%-3.41%6.52%1.04%12.34%-2.67%9.75%
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
0.88%5.05%0.73%5.14%-8.01%0.55%2.60%7.12%0.86%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between WRAIX and WTAIX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2012

-0.02

The correlation between WRAIX and WTAIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRAIX vs. WTAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRAIX
WRAIX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
WRAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
WRAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

WTAIX
WTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
WTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRAIX vs. WTAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WRAIXWTAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.68

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.95

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

5.86

+0.33

WRAIX vs. WTAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the WTAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRAIX and WTAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WRAIX vs. WTAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRAIX drawdown since its inception was -15.44%, which is greater than WTAIX's maximum drawdown of -12.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRAIX and WTAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRAIXWTAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-12.35%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-2.76%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-4.87%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.24%

-12.35%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.44%

-12.35%

-3.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-1.06%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-1.63%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

0.91%

+0.29%

Volatility

WRAIX vs. WTAIX - Volatility Comparison

Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund (WTAIX) at 0.61%. This indicates that WRAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRAIXWTAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

0.61%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.06%

1.66%

+3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.16%

2.08%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

3.08%

+3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.75%

3.43%

+3.32%

WRAIX vs. WTAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRAIX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than WTAIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRAIX vs. WTAIX - Dividend Comparison

WRAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than WTAIX's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WRAIX
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund
0.17%0.17%1.47%1.31%2.77%0.52%1.98%1.15%1.25%1.15%0.30%2.38%
WTAIX
Wilmington Municipal Bond Fund
2.68%2.85%2.11%2.03%1.45%1.68%1.72%3.84%2.15%2.92%2.63%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


WRAIX and WTAIX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WRAIX has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to WTAIX (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRAIX dropped -15.44% vs WTAIX's -12.35%.

WTAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRAIX and WTAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer