WQTM vs. XLK
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. WQTM is actively managed, while XLK is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
WQTM vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 53.55% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 36.47% return.
WQTM
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- 23.76%
- YTD
- 53.55%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
WQTM vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 53.55% | -14.56% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | -0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and XLK is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
XLK
WQTM vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WQTM | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.42 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -82.05% | +55.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -1.00% | -2.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -34.96% | +23.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.98% | 20.82% | +21.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 24.90% | +17.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 24.49% | +17.49% |
WQTM vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and XLK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WQTM.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer