WQTM vs. SCHD
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WQTM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. WQTM is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
WQTM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WQTM having a 21.45% return and SCHD slightly higher at 22.44%.
WQTM
- 1D
- -3.84%
- 1M
- -14.31%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- YTD
- 21.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- YTD
- 22.44%
- 1Y
- 27.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
WQTM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 21.45% | -13.35% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 22.44% | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and SCHD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHD
WQTM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WQTM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -33.37% | +7.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.92% | 0.00% | -23.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.84% | -3.30% | -8.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.33% | 11.04% | +32.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.33% | 14.40% | +28.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.33% | 16.71% | +26.62% |
WQTM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.17% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WQTM.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.
WQTM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer