WQTM vs. KROP
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. WQTM is actively managed, while KROP is passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.
Performance
WQTM vs. KROP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 53.55% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.34% return.
WQTM
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- 23.76%
- YTD
- 53.55%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 0.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WQTM vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 53.55% | -14.56% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 16.34% | -1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and KROP is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
KROP
WQTM vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WQTM | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | -0.57 | +1.83 |
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and KROP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -61.96% | +35.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -49.05% | +45.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -44.50% | +32.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.99% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.98% | 16.04% | +25.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 22.28% | +19.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 22.28% | +19.70% |
WQTM vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison
WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.35% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and KROP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WQTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WQTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.50% for KROP.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and KROP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer