WQTM vs. EPI
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and EPI (WisdomTree India Earnings Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WQTM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while EPI is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree India Earnings Index. WQTM is actively managed, while EPI is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for EPI.
Performance
WQTM vs. EPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 53.55% return, which is significantly higher than EPI's -10.02% return.
WQTM
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- 23.76%
- YTD
- 53.55%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPI
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -10.02%
- 6M
- -8.12%
- 1Y
- -9.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
WQTM vs. EPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 53.55% | -14.56% |
EPI WisdomTree India Earnings Fund | -10.02% | 3.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and EPI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. EPI — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
EPI
WQTM vs. EPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WQTM | EPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.13 | +1.12 |
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. EPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum EPI drawdown of -66.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and EPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | EPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -66.21% | +40.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -17.83% | +14.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -18.65% | +6.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.87% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. EPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | EPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.98% | 14.94% | +27.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 16.21% | +25.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 20.35% | +21.63% |
WQTM vs. EPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than EPI's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. EPI - Dividend Comparison
Neither WQTM nor EPI has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPI WisdomTree India Earnings Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 0.15% | 6.01% | 1.18% | 0.78% | 1.17% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 1.05% | 1.20% |
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and EPI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WQTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WQTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPI.
WQTM and EPI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
WQTM is categorized as Technology Equities, while EPI is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.84% for EPI.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and EPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer