PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPI vs. GLIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPI vs. GLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPI achieves a -6.50% return, which is significantly lower than GLIN's -2.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EPI has outperformed GLIN with an annualized return of 8.60%, while GLIN has yielded a comparatively lower 1.08% annualized return.


EPI

1D
0.67%
1M
0.84%
6M
-6.20%
YTD
-6.50%
1Y
-3.31%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
8.60%
ALL TIME*
3.95%

GLIN

1D
-0.40%
1M
-2.35%
6M
-2.51%
YTD
-2.19%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
1.08%
ALL TIME*
-2.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.82M$16.41M$21.21M
$307.07K$384.97K$454.43K

EPI vs. GLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
-6.50%2.25%10.70%26.03%-4.74%26.41%18.55%1.53%-9.88%39.14%
GLIN
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF
-2.19%-5.47%15.64%36.13%-21.46%29.57%-0.29%-21.49%-37.41%66.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EPI and GLIN is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010

0.87

The correlation between EPI and GLIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPI vs. GLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPI
GLIN

Financial Services

24.3%
34.9%

Energy

15.6%
2.1%

Basic Materials

14.3%
8.2%

Industrials

10.1%
23.3%

Utilities

8.0%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
15.1%

Technology

7.5%
4.1%

Healthcare

6.1%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
0.7%

Communication Services

2.0%
5.1%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.0%

Financial Services

EPI
24.3%
GLIN
34.9%

Energy

EPI
15.6%
GLIN
2.1%

Basic Materials

EPI
14.3%
GLIN
8.2%

Industrials

EPI
10.1%
GLIN
23.3%

Utilities

EPI
8.0%
GLIN
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EPI
7.7%
GLIN
15.1%

Technology

EPI
7.5%
GLIN
4.1%

Healthcare

EPI
6.1%
GLIN
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

EPI
3.4%
GLIN
0.7%

Communication Services

EPI
2.0%
GLIN
5.1%

Real Estate

EPI
0.9%
GLIN
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPI vs. GLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EPI
EPI Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
EPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPI Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIN
GLIN Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
GLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPI vs. GLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) and VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPIGLINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.04

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

0.13

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

0.46

-0.96

EPI vs. GLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPI Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the GLIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPI and GLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPI vs. GLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPI drawdown since its inception was -66.21%, smaller than the maximum GLIN drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPI and GLIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPIGLINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.21%

-79.36%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.69%

-17.07%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.89%

-26.77%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.89%

-30.97%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.29%

-74.80%

+24.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.61%

-44.40%

+29.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.63%

-50.88%

+32.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

4.77%

+1.92%

Volatility

EPI vs. GLIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) is 3.55%, while VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF (GLIN) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that EPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPIGLINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

4.80%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

15.63%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

18.27%

-2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

18.36%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

23.65%

-3.37%

EPI vs. GLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPI has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIN's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPI vs. GLIN - Dividend Comparison

EPI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
0.00%0.00%0.27%0.15%6.01%1.18%0.78%1.17%1.18%0.85%1.05%1.20%
GLIN
VanEck Vectors India Growth Leaders ETF
0.86%0.84%3.58%0.96%1.70%0.00%0.24%1.42%0.12%0.10%1.39%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPI and GLIN have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIN has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to EPI (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPI dropped -66.21% vs GLIN's -79.36%.

On 10-year performance, EPI leads with 8.60% vs 1.08% for GLIN. On fees, GLIN is cheaper at 0.82% per year. On volatility, EPI has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPI has performed better with a 8.60% return vs 1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLIN is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPI.

GLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for EPI.

EPI tracks WisdomTree India Earnings Index, while GLIN tracks MarketGrader India All-Cap Growth Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for EPI and 0.82% for GLIN.

GLIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPI and GLIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer