WQTM vs. DHS
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WQTM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. WQTM is actively managed, while DHS is passively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.
Performance
WQTM vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 41.85% return, which is significantly higher than DHS's 12.48% return.
WQTM
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- 41.85%
- 6M
- 37.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHS
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
WQTM vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 41.85% | -13.35% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 12.48% | 2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and DHS is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DHS
WQTM vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WQTM | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -67.25% | +41.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.14% | -1.30% | -9.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.57% | -9.53% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.40% | 10.19% | +33.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 13.88% | +29.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.40% | 16.08% | +27.32% |
WQTM vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.28% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and DHS have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WQTM.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.
WQTM is categorized as Technology Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.38% for DHS.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer