WQTM vs. CHAT
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.
Performance
WQTM vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 53.55% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 74.30% return.
WQTM
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- 23.76%
- YTD
- 53.55%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 27.78%
- YTD
- 74.30%
- 6M
- 73.13%
- 1Y
- 144.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WQTM vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 53.55% | -14.56% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 74.30% | -7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and CHAT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
CHAT
WQTM vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WQTM | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.98 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -31.34% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -0.66% | -3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -5.35% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.51% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.98% | 30.74% | +11.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 29.90% | +12.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 29.90% | +12.08% |
WQTM vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
WQTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.64% | 2.85% |
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and CHAT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WQTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WQTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for WQTM.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.75% for CHAT.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer