WQDS.L vs. SSLN.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WQDS.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - WQDS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WQDS.L returned 13.76%/yr vs 22.99%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WQDS.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.

Performance

WQDS.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WQDS.L achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's 3.18% return.

WQDS.L

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 5.99%
• YTD: 15.10%
• 6M: 15.33%
• 1Y: 33.02%
• 3Y*: 17.21%
• 5Y*: 13.76%
• 10Y*: —

SSLN.L

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -3.40%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 25.57%
• 1Y: 108.67%
• 3Y*: 42.31%
• 5Y*: 22.99%
• 10Y*: 16.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQDS.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WQDS.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	15.10%	16.53%	12.46%	11.62%	4.66%	18.72%	-2.56%	19.86%	-1.40%	2.29%
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC	3.18%	130.26%	23.21%	-6.20%	15.75%	-11.64%	40.73%	12.68%	-3.48%	-7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between WQDS.L and SSLN.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017	0.13

Return for Risk

WQDS.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WQDS.L

WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 87

SSLN.L

SSLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SSLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
SSLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SSLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SSLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQDS.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WQDS.L	SSLN.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	2.11	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.56	2.42	+2.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.37	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.90	2.98	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.20	6.53	+11.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WQDS.L vs. SSLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WQDS.L and SSLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WQDS.L	SSLN.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	2.11	+1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.19	0.70	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.17	+0.63

Drawdowns

WQDS.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQDS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQDS.L and SSLN.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	WQDS.L	SSLN.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.24%	-69.95%	+45.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.75%	-38.72%	+31.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.93%	-38.72%	+23.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.93%	-38.72%	+23.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-33.62%	+33.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-45.32%	+42.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	17.69%	-15.87%

Volatility

WQDS.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) is 3.09%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that WQDS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WQDS.L	SSLN.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	16.31%	-13.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.72%	51.81%	-44.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.37%	54.53%	-44.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.58%	33.31%	-21.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.22%	29.69%	-16.47%

WQDS.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQDS.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

WQDS.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison

WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while SSLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WQDS.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	2.90%	3.12%	3.24%	3.55%	3.56%	3.71%	3.84%	3.98%	4.19%	1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WQDS.L and SSLN.L in my portfolio?

WQDS.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WQDS.L or SSLN.L?

On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WQDS.L or SSLN.L?

SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.

What is the main difference between WQDS.L and SSLN.L?

WQDS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SSLN.L is Silver. WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDS.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.