PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE).

WQDS.L and NQSE.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WQDS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. It was launched on May 14, 2020. NQSE.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both WQDS.L and NQSE.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		2.79%16.53%12.46%11.62%4.66%18.72%-2.56%19.75%-5.25%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		-5.77%24.31%18.66%49.06%-32.80%18.38%53.43%28.61%-14.92%
Different Trading Currencies

WQDS.L is traded in GBp, while NQSE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the NQSE.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WQDS.L achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly higher than NQSE.DE's -5.77% return.

WQDS.L

1D
1.85%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
2.79%
6M
8.56%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
—

NQSE.DE

1D
3.47%
1M
-2.92%
YTD
-5.77%
6M
-2.89%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
20.43%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with WQDS.L:
WQDS.L vs. PSRE.LWQDS.L vs. FGQD.LWQDS.L vs. VGWD.DEWQDS.L vs. HDVWQDS.L vs. QQMGWQDS.L vs. TDGB.LWQDS.L vs. IS3Q.DE
Often compared with NQSE.DE:
NQSE.DE vs. SXRV.DENQSE.DE vs. CNDX.ASNQSE.DE vs. QQQNQSE.DE vs. JEQP.LNQSE.DE vs. EQQB.DENQSE.DE vs. CNDX.LNQSE.DE vs. SXR8.DE

WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQDS.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.

WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WQDS.LNQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.40

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

2.11

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

2.09

+0.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.07

7.09

+2.98

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WQDS.L and NQSE.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WQDS.LNQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.40

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.53

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.67

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between WQDS.L and NQSE.DE is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while NQSE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		3.57%3.12%3.24%3.55%3.56%3.71%3.84%3.98%4.18%1.05%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WQDS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQDS.L and NQSE.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

WQDS.LNQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-37.67%

+13.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-12.03%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.93%

-37.67%

+22.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.02%

-8.45%

+4.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-8.72%

+5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.35%

-1.39%

Volatility

WQDS.L vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) is 4.13%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that WQDS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

WQDS.LNQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

6.30%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

12.32%

-4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.76%

19.67%

-5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.52%

20.90%

-9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.22%

21.50%

-7.28%