WPSGX vs. AGRFX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

WPSGX (AB Concentrated Growth Fund) and AGRFX (AB Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, WPSGX returned 11.99%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for AGRFX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WPSGX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for AGRFX.

Performance

WPSGX vs. AGRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPSGX achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly lower than AGRFX's 5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, WPSGX has underperformed AGRFX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while AGRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.11% annualized return.

WPSGX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 2.43%
• 6M: -5.21%
• YTD: -3.73%
• 1Y: -3.31%
• 3Y*: 6.76%
• 5Y*: 2.58%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

AGRFX

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 0.82%
• 6M: 3.92%
• YTD: 5.05%
• 1Y: 9.19%
• 3Y*: 18.21%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: 16.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPSGX vs. AGRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WPSGX AB Concentrated Growth Fund	-3.73%	6.29%	11.16%	19.70%	-24.61%	31.53%	21.22%	44.50%	1.56%	22.99%
AGRFX AB Growth Fund	5.05%	10.84%	31.50%	37.95%	-29.65%	21.40%	35.97%	31.11%	3.75%	33.88%

Correlation

The correlation between WPSGX and AGRFX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 1994	0.85

The correlation between WPSGX and AGRFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WPSGX vs. AGRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPSGX

WPSGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
WPSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
WPSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
WPSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
WPSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
WPSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

AGRFX

AGRFX Risk / Return Rank: 9
AGRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
AGRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
AGRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
AGRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
AGRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPSGX vs. AGRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) and AB Growth Fund (AGRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WPSGX	AGRFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	0.61	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.14	0.94	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.12	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	0.62	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	2.16	-2.52

WPSGX vs. AGRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WPSGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the AGRFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WPSGX and AGRFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WPSGX vs. AGRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPSGX drawdown since its inception was -90.28%, which is greater than AGRFX's maximum drawdown of -61.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPSGX and AGRFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WPSGX	AGRFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.28%	-61.88%	-28.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.52%	-15.92%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.66%	-22.08%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.60%	-35.21%	+2.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.22%	-35.21%	-1.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.89%	-3.16%	-3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.60%	-15.71%	-20.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.38%	4.59%	+1.79%

Volatility

WPSGX vs. AGRFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Concentrated Growth Fund (WPSGX) is 3.22%, while AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that WPSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WPSGX	AGRFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.22%	4.89%	-1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.75%	13.04%	-2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.61%	16.40%	-2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.15%	21.00%	-2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.41%	20.50%	-1.09%

WPSGX vs. AGRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPSGX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AGRFX's 1.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

WPSGX vs. AGRFX - Dividend Comparison

WPSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.85%, less than AGRFX's 15.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGRFX AB Growth Fund	15.59%	16.37%	21.03%	7.20%	1.69%	9.79%	5.79%	7.80%	16.01%	9.33%	1.03%	9.76%
WPSGX AB Concentrated Growth Fund	8.85%	8.52%	11.43%	1.15%	1.95%	10.55%	3.56%	6.53%	8.08%	3.51%	0.44%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WPSGX and AGRFX in my portfolio?

WPSGX and AGRFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WPSGX or AGRFX?

AGRFX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to WPSGX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WPSGX dropped -90.28% vs AGRFX's -61.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.