AGRFX vs. FKASX

Last updated Jun 17, 2026

AGRFX (AB Growth Fund) and FKASX (Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - AGRFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while FKASX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, AGRFX returned 16.82%/yr vs 14.15%/yr for FKASX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGRFX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for FKASX.

Performance

AGRFX vs. FKASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) and Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGRFX achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than FKASX's 13.46% return. Over the past 10 years, AGRFX has outperformed FKASX with an annualized return of 16.82%, while FKASX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.15% annualized return.

AGRFX

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 8.59%
• 1Y: 16.17%
• 3Y*: 20.61%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: 16.82%

FKASX

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 7.19%
• YTD: 13.46%
• 6M: 13.74%
• 1Y: 24.01%
• 3Y*: 14.67%
• 5Y*: 2.08%
• 10Y*: 14.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGRFX vs. FKASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AGRFX AB Growth Fund	7.07%	10.84%	31.50%	37.95%	-29.65%	21.40%	35.97%	31.11%	3.75%	33.88%
FKASX Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund	13.46%	12.01%	14.45%	14.48%	-31.40%	2.57%	43.41%	33.44%	7.30%	37.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AGRFX and FKASX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2002	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between AGRFX and FKASX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AGRFX vs. FKASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGRFX

AGRFX Risk / Return Rank: 18
AGRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
AGRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
AGRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
AGRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AGRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FKASX

FKASX Risk / Return Rank: 24
FKASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FKASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FKASX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FKASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FKASX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGRFX vs. FKASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) and Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AGRFX	FKASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.11	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	1.71	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.23	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	1.56	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	6.47	-2.53

AGRFX vs. FKASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGRFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the FKASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGRFX and FKASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AGRFX vs. FKASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGRFX drawdown since its inception was -61.88%, roughly equal to the maximum FKASX drawdown of -60.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRFX and FKASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGRFX	FKASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.88%	-60.21%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.92%	-14.88%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.08%	-26.19%	+4.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.21%	-44.51%	+9.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.21%	-44.86%	+9.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	0.00%	-1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.74%	-12.67%	-3.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.49%	3.59%	+0.90%

Volatility

AGRFX vs. FKASX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) is 5.33%, while Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund (FKASX) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that AGRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGRFX	FKASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	8.31%	-2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	17.67%	-4.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.12%	21.02%	-4.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	23.52%	-2.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.51%	22.43%	-1.92%

AGRFX vs. FKASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGRFX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FKASX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGRFX vs. FKASX - Dividend Comparison

AGRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.29%, less than FKASX's 18.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGRFX AB Growth Fund	15.29%	16.37%	21.03%	7.20%	1.69%	9.79%	5.79%	7.80%	16.01%	9.33%	1.03%	9.76%
FKASX Federated Hermes Kaufmann Small Cap Fund	18.25%	20.70%	11.82%	0.15%	0.00%	8.40%	0.12%	0.21%	6.36%	6.50%	0.76%	8.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGRFX and FKASX in my portfolio?

AGRFX and FKASX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AGRFX or FKASX?

FKASX has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to AGRFX (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRFX dropped -61.88% vs FKASX's -60.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.