AGRFX vs. RPXIX

Last updated Jun 17, 2026

AGRFX (AB Growth Fund) and RPXIX (RiverPark Large Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AGRFX returned 16.82%/yr vs 12.01%/yr for RPXIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AGRFX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for RPXIX.

Performance

AGRFX vs. RPXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGRFX achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly higher than RPXIX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, AGRFX has outperformed RPXIX with an annualized return of 16.82%, while RPXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.01% annualized return.

AGRFX

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 7.07%
• 6M: 8.59%
• 1Y: 16.17%
• 3Y*: 20.61%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: 16.82%

RPXIX

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: 10.57%
• 3Y*: 17.43%
• 5Y*: 0.33%
• 10Y*: 12.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGRFX vs. RPXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AGRFX AB Growth Fund	7.07%	10.84%	31.50%	37.95%	-29.65%	21.40%	35.97%	31.11%	3.75%	33.88%
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	0.65%	13.18%	22.55%	51.57%	-47.37%	1.09%	55.28%	32.49%	-4.78%	30.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AGRFX and RPXIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.92

The correlation between AGRFX and RPXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AGRFX vs. RPXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGRFX

AGRFX Risk / Return Rank: 18
AGRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
AGRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
AGRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
AGRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AGRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

RPXIX

RPXIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
RPXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
RPXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
RPXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RPXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RPXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGRFX vs. RPXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) and RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AGRFX	RPXIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	0.82	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	1.20	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.15	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	0.79	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.93	2.64	+1.29

AGRFX vs. RPXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGRFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the RPXIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGRFX and RPXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AGRFX vs. RPXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGRFX drawdown since its inception was -61.88%, which is greater than RPXIX's maximum drawdown of -58.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGRFX and RPXIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AGRFX	RPXIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.88%	-58.56%	-3.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.92%	-15.28%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.08%	-21.93%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.21%	-58.56%	+23.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.21%	-58.56%	+23.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-7.28%	+5.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.74%	-11.62%	-4.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.49%	4.55%	-0.06%

Volatility

AGRFX vs. RPXIX - Volatility Comparison

AB Growth Fund (AGRFX) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to RiverPark Large Growth Fund (RPXIX) at 4.93%. This indicates that AGRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AGRFX	RPXIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	4.93%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	11.71%	+0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.12%	14.77%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.92%	26.32%	-5.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.51%	24.77%	-4.26%

AGRFX vs. RPXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGRFX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than RPXIX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

AGRFX vs. RPXIX - Dividend Comparison

AGRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.29%, more than RPXIX's 9.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGRFX AB Growth Fund	15.29%	16.37%	21.03%	7.20%	1.69%	9.79%	5.79%	7.80%	16.01%	9.33%	1.03%	9.76%
RPXIX RiverPark Large Growth Fund	9.09%	9.15%	7.22%	0.00%	0.01%	3.79%	6.69%	11.76%	15.17%	9.01%	0.54%	1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AGRFX and RPXIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, AGRFX and RPXIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AGRFX or RPXIX?

AGRFX has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to RPXIX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGRFX dropped -61.88% vs RPXIX's -58.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AGRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.