PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACGYX vs. ALCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACGYX vs. ALCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Income Fund (ACGYX) and AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio (ALCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACGYX achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than ALCAX's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGYX has underperformed ALCAX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while ALCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.93% annualized return.


ACGYX

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.57%
6M
-0.71%
YTD
-0.71%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
-0.66%
10Y*
1.82%
ALL TIME*
2.11%

ALCAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.61%
6M
0.16%
YTD
0.54%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
3.78%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
1.93%
ALL TIME*
4.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ACGYX vs. ALCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACGYX
AB Income Fund
-0.71%7.86%2.07%6.16%-15.45%-1.30%6.88%11.25%-1.21%6.33%
ALCAX
AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio
0.54%4.84%2.41%6.38%-8.98%1.71%4.86%7.05%0.54%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between ACGYX and ALCAX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016

0.57

The correlation between ACGYX and ALCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACGYX vs. ALCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACGYX
ACGYX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ACGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ACGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ALCAX
ALCAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ALCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ALCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACGYX vs. ALCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Income Fund (ACGYX) and AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio (ALCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACGYXALCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.50

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

2.00

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.36

6.35

-3.98

ACGYX vs. ALCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACGYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the ALCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACGYX and ALCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACGYX vs. ALCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACGYX drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, which is greater than ALCAX's maximum drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGYX and ALCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACGYXALCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.58%

-14.67%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-2.90%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.82%

-4.64%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.58%

-14.31%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.58%

-14.31%

-7.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-1.61%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-1.79%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

0.91%

+0.31%

Volatility

ACGYX vs. ALCAX - Volatility Comparison

AB Income Fund (ACGYX) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio (ALCAX) at 0.92%. This indicates that ACGYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACGYXALCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.92%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

2.17%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39%

2.77%

+1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.53%

3.86%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.48%

3.85%

+1.63%

ACGYX vs. ALCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACGYX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than ALCAX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACGYX vs. ALCAX - Dividend Comparison

ACGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than ALCAX's 3.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACGYX
AB Income Fund
5.00%5.02%5.38%4.04%3.99%2.95%3.80%4.50%4.54%5.84%3.23%0.00%
ALCAX
AB Municipal Income Fund California Portfolio
3.39%4.38%3.15%2.84%2.43%1.61%2.74%3.35%3.63%3.21%3.38%3.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACGYX and ALCAX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACGYX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to ALCAX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACGYX dropped -21.58% vs ALCAX's -14.67%.

ALCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACGYX and ALCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer