ACGYX vs. AUNYX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ACGYX (AB Income Fund) and AUNYX (AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy) are both mutual funds - ACGYX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while AUNYX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, ACGYX returned 2.21%/yr vs 3.25%/yr for AUNYX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACGYX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for AUNYX.

Performance

ACGYX vs. AUNYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Income Fund (ACGYX) and AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACGYX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than AUNYX's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGYX has underperformed AUNYX with an annualized return of 2.21%, while AUNYX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.25% annualized return.

ACGYX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 0.47%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 5.83%
• 3Y*: 4.86%
• 5Y*: -0.10%
• 10Y*: 2.21%

AUNYX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 3.13%
• 1Y: 7.39%
• 3Y*: 4.54%
• 5Y*: 2.72%
• 10Y*: 3.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACGYX vs. AUNYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACGYX AB Income Fund	0.47%	7.86%	2.07%	6.16%	-15.45%	-1.30%	6.88%	11.25%	-1.21%	6.33%
AUNYX AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy	2.87%	5.19%	2.36%	5.17%	-4.84%	7.30%	4.58%	6.74%	-0.07%	3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between ACGYX and AUNYX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016	0.12

The correlation between ACGYX and AUNYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ACGYX vs. AUNYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACGYX

ACGYX Risk / Return Rank: 20
ACGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ACGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
ACGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ACGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
ACGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

AUNYX

AUNYX Risk / Return Rank: 93
AUNYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AUNYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
AUNYX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
AUNYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
AUNYX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACGYX vs. AUNYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Income Fund (ACGYX) and AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACGYX	AUNYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	3.41	-2.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	5.13	-3.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.77	-0.55
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	4.19	-2.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	19.20	-13.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACGYX vs. AUNYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACGYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the AUNYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACGYX and AUNYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACGYX	AUNYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	3.41	-2.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.80	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	0.91	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.88	-0.46

Drawdowns

ACGYX vs. AUNYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACGYX drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, which is greater than AUNYX's maximum drawdown of -14.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGYX and AUNYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACGYX	AUNYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.58%	-14.10%	-7.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.36%	-1.74%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.70%	-3.53%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.58%	-8.44%	-13.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.58%	-14.10%	-7.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	0.00%	-2.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.41%	-1.38%	-4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	0.38%	+0.65%

Volatility

ACGYX vs. AUNYX - Volatility Comparison

AB Income Fund (ACGYX) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy (AUNYX) at 0.80%. This indicates that ACGYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUNYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACGYX	AUNYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.70%	0.80%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.32%	1.68%	+1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.44%	2.12%	+2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.50%	3.41%	+3.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.47%	3.59%	+1.88%

ACGYX vs. AUNYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACGYX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than AUNYX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACGYX vs. AUNYX - Dividend Comparison

ACGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than AUNYX's 3.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACGYX AB Income Fund	4.93%	5.02%	5.38%	4.04%	3.99%	2.95%	3.80%	4.50%	4.54%	5.84%	3.23%	0.00%
AUNYX AB Municipal Bond Inflation Strategy	3.02%	3.26%	2.53%	2.44%	1.64%	1.66%	2.37%	2.86%	2.64%	2.13%	2.01%	1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACGYX and AUNYX in my portfolio?

ACGYX and AUNYX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACGYX or AUNYX?

ACGYX has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to AUNYX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACGYX dropped -21.58% vs AUNYX's -14.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUNYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.