WPAY vs. QRMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF (WPAY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI).

WPAY and QRMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WPAY is a passively managed fund by Roundhill that tracks the performance of the Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe Index. It was launched on Sep 3, 2025. QRMI is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.

Performance

WPAY vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF (WPAY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WPAY vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WPAY Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF	-10.65%	-2.47%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	-2.50%	5.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPAY achieves a -10.65% return, which is significantly lower than QRMI's -2.50% return.

WPAY

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: -10.65%
• 6M: -19.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QRMI

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: -2.50%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPAY vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPAY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

WPAY

Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF

QRMI

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF

Return for Risk

WPAY vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 21
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 20
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPAY vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF (WPAY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WPAY	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.78	0.09	-0.88

Correlation

The correlation between WPAY and QRMI is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WPAY vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

WPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.55%, more than QRMI's 12.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WPAY Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF	36.55%	21.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.66%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%

Drawdowns

WPAY vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPAY drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, which is greater than QRMI's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPAY and QRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	WPAY	QRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.17%	-20.95%	-5.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.35%	-3.54%	-21.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.92%	-8.25%	-3.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WPAY	QRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.83%	7.77%	+21.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.83%	8.46%	+20.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.83%	8.46%	+20.37%