WPAY vs. QQQ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF (WPAY) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ).

WPAY and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WPAY is a passively managed fund by Roundhill that tracks the performance of the Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe Index. It was launched on Sep 3, 2025. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both WPAY and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

WPAY vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF (WPAY) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WPAY vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WPAY Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF	-10.65%	-2.47%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	-4.76%	7.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WPAY achieves a -10.65% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -4.76% return.

WPAY

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: -10.65%
• 6M: -19.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQ

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -3.79%
• YTD: -4.76%
• 6M: -2.89%
• 1Y: 24.21%
• 3Y*: 22.83%
• 5Y*: 13.16%
• 10Y*: 18.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPAY vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPAY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

WPAY

Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF

QQQ

Invesco QQQ ETF

Return for Risk

WPAY vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 65
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPAY vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF (WPAY) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WPAY	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.78	0.38	-1.16

Correlation

The correlation between WPAY and QQQ is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

WPAY vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

WPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.55%, more than QQQ's 0.48% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WPAY Roundhill WeeklyPay™ Universe ETF	36.55%	21.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.48%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Drawdowns

WPAY vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WPAY drawdown since its inception was -26.17%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WPAY and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	WPAY	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.17%	-82.97%	+56.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.62%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.35%	-7.86%	-17.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.92%	-32.99%	+21.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WPAY	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.83%	22.70%	+6.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.83%	22.38%	+6.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.83%	22.25%	+6.58%