WOOD vs. GOEX
WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) and GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) are both Materials funds - WOOD tracks the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index while GOEX tracks the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WOOD returned 5.20%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for GOEX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WOOD charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOEX.
Performance
WOOD vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOOD achieves a -6.95% return, which is significantly lower than GOEX's -5.02% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOD has underperformed GOEX with an annualized return of 5.20%, while GOEX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
WOOD
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- -6.95%
- 6M
- -3.23%
- 1Y
- -6.85%
- 3Y*
- -0.20%
- 5Y*
- -3.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
GOEX
- 1D
- -4.11%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- YTD
- -5.02%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.31%
- 5Y*
- 18.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
WOOD vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | -6.95% | -3.27% | -4.21% | 13.84% | -19.39% | 17.03% | 20.36% | 19.75% | -17.73% | 34.49% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -5.02% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOOD and GOEX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010 | 0.28 |
The correlation between WOOD and GOEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WOOD vs. GOEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WOOD
GOEX
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
WOOD
GOEX
Consumer Cyclical
WOOD
GOEX
-
Real Estate
WOOD
GOEX
-
Communication Services
WOOD
-
GOEX
-
Consumer Defensive
WOOD
-
GOEX
-
Energy
WOOD
-
GOEX
-
Financial Services
WOOD
-
GOEX
-
Healthcare
WOOD
-
GOEX
-
Industrials
WOOD
-
GOEX
-
Technology
WOOD
-
GOEX
-
Utilities
WOOD
-
GOEX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOOD vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank
WOOD
GOEX
WOOD vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WOOD | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.24 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 1.97 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 4.94 | -5.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WOOD | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 | 1.31 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.49 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.35 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.02 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
WOOD vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOOD drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, smaller than the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOD and GOEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOOD | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.25% | -88.83% | +25.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.64% | -32.78% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -32.78% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.71% | -47.16% | +16.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | -53.66% | +3.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.31% | -29.90% | +5.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -63.59% | +48.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.27% | 13.04% | -3.77% |
Volatility
WOOD vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) is 5.70%, while Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a volatility of 14.62%. This indicates that WOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOOD | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 14.62% | -8.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 39.87% | -25.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 49.13% | -30.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.72% | 39.00% | -19.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 39.97% | -18.10% |
WOOD vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOOD has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
WOOD vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison
WOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than GOEX's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.19% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 1.24% | 0.98% | 1.85% | 2.82% | 1.19% | 1.65% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WOOD and GOEX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOEX has higher volatility (14.62%) compared to WOOD (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOOD dropped -63.25% vs GOEX's -88.83%.
On 10-year performance, GOEX leads with 13.99% vs 5.20% for WOOD. On fees, WOOD is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WOOD is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.
WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.19% for GOEX.
WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for WOOD and 0.65% for GOEX.
GOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WOOD and GOEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer