WOOD vs. COPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both Materials funds - WOOD tracks the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index while COPX tracks the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WOOD returned 5.20%/yr vs 21.95%/yr for COPX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WOOD charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.

Performance

WOOD vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOOD achieves a -6.95% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOD has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 5.20%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.95% annualized return.

WOOD

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -0.81%
• YTD: -6.95%
• 6M: -3.23%
• 1Y: -6.85%
• 3Y*: -0.20%
• 5Y*: -3.93%
• 10Y*: 5.20%

COPX

• 1D: -3.64%
• 1M: 17.74%
• YTD: 25.71%
• 6M: 36.90%
• 1Y: 120.82%
• 3Y*: 37.36%
• 5Y*: 19.87%
• 10Y*: 21.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOOD vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	-6.95%	-3.27%	-4.21%	13.84%	-19.39%	17.03%	20.36%	19.75%	-17.73%	34.49%
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	25.71%	93.50%	3.57%	8.38%	-0.76%	23.39%	51.66%	12.48%	-31.31%	38.92%

Correlation

The correlation between WOOD and COPX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010	0.63

The correlation between WOOD and COPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WOOD vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WOOD	COPX
Basic Materials	63.6%	96.3%
Consumer Cyclical	23.5%	-
Real Estate	12.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	3.7%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WOOD vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOOD

WOOD Risk / Return Rank: 5
WOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
WOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
WOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 5
WOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
WOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 5

COPX

COPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOOD vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WOOD	COPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	2.93	-3.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.40	3.17	-3.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.42	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	4.37	-4.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.74	14.00	-14.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WOOD vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOOD Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOOD and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WOOD	COPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.37	2.93	-3.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.55	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.62	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.19	-0.04

Drawdowns

WOOD vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOOD drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOD and COPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WOOD	COPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.25%	-83.16%	+19.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.64%	-27.82%	+6.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	-39.72%	+16.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.71%	-42.12%	+11.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.20%	-65.41%	+15.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.31%	-5.69%	-18.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-39.30%	+24.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.27%	8.66%	+0.61%

Volatility

WOOD vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) is 5.70%, while Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that WOOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WOOD	COPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.70%	15.38%	-9.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.96%	35.68%	-21.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.70%	41.41%	-22.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.72%	36.51%	-16.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.87%	35.55%	-13.68%

WOOD vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOOD has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

WOOD vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

WOOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than COPX's 2.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	2.13%	2.68%	1.80%	2.39%	3.14%	1.48%	1.30%	1.37%	2.59%	1.57%	0.60%	1.20%
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF	2.69%	2.51%	2.09%	1.64%	2.26%	1.24%	0.98%	1.85%	2.82%	1.19%	1.65%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WOOD and COPX in my portfolio?

WOOD and COPX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WOOD or COPX?

COPX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to WOOD (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOOD dropped -63.25% vs COPX's -83.16%.

Which ETF is better, WOOD or COPX?

On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.95% vs 5.20% for WOOD. On fees, WOOD is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, WOOD has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WOOD or COPX?

Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.95% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WOOD or COPX?

WOOD is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WOOD or COPX?

WOOD has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.13% for COPX.

What is the main difference between WOOD and COPX?

WOOD tracks S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for WOOD and 0.65% for COPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.