WOMN vs. GQGU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WOMN (Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. WOMN is passively managed, while GQGU is actively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WOMN charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.

Performance

WOMN vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOMN achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 6.44% return.

WOMN

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 4.89%
• 6M: 5.52%
• 1Y: 12.46%
• 3Y*: 15.17%
• 5Y*: 8.80%
• 10Y*: —

GQGU

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -1.69%
• YTD: 6.44%
• 6M: 7.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOMN vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF	4.89%	4.87%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	6.44%	-1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between WOMN and GQGU is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.17

Return for Risk

WOMN vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOMN

WOMN Risk / Return Rank: 33
WOMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
WOMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
WOMN Omega Ratio Rank: 31
WOMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
WOMN Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOMN vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WOMN	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.90	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WOMN	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.58	+0.14

Drawdowns

WOMN vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOMN drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOMN and GQGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	WOMN	GQGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.23%	-6.65%	-25.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-4.80%	+4.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.53%	-2.55%	-2.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WOMN	GQGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.84%	10.12%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.16%	10.12%	+6.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.70%	10.12%	+8.58%

WOMN vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

WOMN vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

WOMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.96%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF	0.78%	0.76%	1.08%	1.80%	5.59%	3.10%	6.15%	1.12%	0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WOMN and GQGU in my portfolio?

WOMN and GQGU have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WOMN or GQGU?

On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WOMN or GQGU?

GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for WOMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WOMN or GQGU?

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.78% for WOMN.

What is the main difference between WOMN and GQGU?

They also come from different issuers: Impact Shares and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for WOMN and 0.49% for GQGU.