WOMN vs. GQGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU).

WOMN and GQGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WOMN is a passively managed fund by Impact Shares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Women’s Empowerment Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2018. GQGU is an actively managed fund by GQG Partners. It was launched on Jul 14, 2025.

Performance

WOMN vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WOMN vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF	-4.03%	4.87%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	8.19%	-1.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOMN achieves a -4.03% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 8.19% return.

WOMN

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -4.10%
• YTD: -4.03%
• 6M: -2.04%
• 1Y: 4.70%
• 3Y*: 13.44%
• 5Y*: 7.81%
• 10Y*: —

GQGU

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -3.10%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOMN vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

WOMN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.

WOMN

Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF

GQGU

GQG US Equity ETF

Return for Risk

WOMN vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOMN

WOMN Risk / Return Rank: 20
WOMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
WOMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
WOMN Omega Ratio Rank: 19
WOMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
WOMN Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOMN vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF (WOMN) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WOMN	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WOMN	GQGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	1.02	-0.36

Correlation

The correlation between WOMN and GQGU is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WOMN vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

WOMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than GQGU's 0.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WOMN Impact Shares YWCA Women’s Empowerment ETF	0.86%	0.76%	1.08%	1.80%	5.59%	3.10%	6.15%	1.12%	0.90%
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF	0.94%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WOMN vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOMN drawdown since its inception was -32.23%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOMN and GQGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	WOMN	GQGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.23%	-6.65%	-25.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.62%	-3.24%	-2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.63%	-2.21%	-3.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WOMN	GQGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.75%	9.66%	+7.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.18%	9.66%	+6.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	9.66%	+9.18%