WOLF vs. GFS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

WOLF (Wolfspeed, Inc.) and GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WOLF vs. GFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF) and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOLF achieves a 147.79% return, which is significantly higher than GFS's 133.05% return.

WOLF

• 1D: -5.27%
• 1M: -30.56%
• YTD: 147.79%
• 6M: 132.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GFS

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 14.57%
• YTD: 133.05%
• 6M: 110.12%
• 1Y: 121.62%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOLF vs. GFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WOLF Wolfspeed, Inc.	147.79%	-3.28%
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.	133.05%	-1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between WOLF and GFS is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025	0.36

Fundamentals

Market Cap WOLF : $16.95B GFS : $45.65B
EPS WOLF : -$11.53 GFS : $1.39
PS Ratio WOLF : 8.31 GFS : 6.66
PB Ratio WOLF : 16.59 GFS : 3.90
Total Revenue (TTM) WOLF : $712.50M GFS : $6.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) WOLF : -$208.10M GFS : $1.81B
EBITDA (TTM) WOLF : -$1.26B GFS : $2.16B

Return for Risk

WOLF vs. GFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOLF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GFS

GFS Risk / Return Rank: 89
GFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GFS Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GFS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOLF vs. GFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF) and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WOLF	GFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.14	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.87	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.21	—

Drawdowns

WOLF vs. GFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOLF drawdown since its inception was -58.22%, smaller than the maximum GFS drawdown of -61.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOLF and GFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	WOLF	GFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.22%	-61.53%	+3.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-24.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-55.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.31%	-9.54%	-31.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.76%	-34.49%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WOLF	GFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	26.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	123.89%	54.03%	+69.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	123.89%	51.19%	+72.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	123.89%	51.19%	+72.70%

Dividends

WOLF vs. GFS - Dividend Comparison

Neither WOLF nor GFS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

WOLF vs. GFS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wolfspeed, Inc. and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WOLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wolfspeed, Inc. reported a gross profit of -27.00M and revenue of 150.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -18.0%.

GFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

WOLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wolfspeed, Inc. reported an operating income of -101.30M and revenue of 150.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -67.4%.

GFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

WOLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wolfspeed, Inc. reported a net income of -119.90M and revenue of 150.20M, resulting in a net margin of -79.8%.

GFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WOLF and GFS in my portfolio?

WOLF and GFS have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.