WNS vs. COP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WNS (WNS (Holdings) Limited) and COP (ConocoPhillips Company) are both stocks. WNS operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while COP operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy).

Performance

WNS vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WNS (Holdings) Limited (WNS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WNS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COP

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -2.60%
• YTD: 29.31%
• 6M: 29.99%
• 1Y: 43.32%
• 3Y*: 8.84%
• 5Y*: 18.99%
• 10Y*: 13.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNS vs. COP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WNS WNS (Holdings) Limited	0.00%	0.00%
COP ConocoPhillips Company	29.31%	8.71%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WNS : $3.46B COP : $146.05B
EPS WNS : $3.60 COP : $5.90
PE Ratio WNS : 21.23 COP : 20.21
PEG Ratio WNS : 1.19 COP : 1.17
PS Ratio WNS : 2.57 COP : 2.54
PB Ratio WNS : 4.34 COP : 2.26
Total Revenue (TTM) WNS : $1.35B COP : $58.31B
Gross Profit (TTM) WNS : $468.49M COP : $17.02B
EBITDA (TTM) WNS : $277.69M COP : $22.44B

Return for Risk

WNS vs. COP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COP

COP Risk / Return Rank: 78
COP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
COP Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
COP Omega Ratio Rank: 72
COP Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
COP Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNS vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WNS (Holdings) Limited (WNS) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WNS	COP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.23	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	WNS	COP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-84.55%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.90%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.19%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-10.23%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-25.48%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WNS	COP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.77%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	29.25%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	32.72%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	37.67%	—

Dividends

WNS vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

WNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COP ConocoPhillips Company	2.77%	3.40%	3.35%	3.37%	4.23%	2.70%	4.23%	2.05%	1.86%	1.93%	1.99%	6.30%
WNS WNS (Holdings) Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

WNS vs. COP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between WNS (Holdings) Limited and ConocoPhillips Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WNS (Holdings) Limited reported a gross profit of 116.60M and revenue of 353.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.

COP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a gross profit of 7.50B and revenue of 16.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.7%.

WNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WNS (Holdings) Limited reported an operating income of 33.10M and revenue of 353.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

COP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported an operating income of 3.36B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

WNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WNS (Holdings) Limited reported a net income of 21.80M and revenue of 353.80M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

COP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ConocoPhillips Company reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 16.05B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.