WNS vs. AON

In the year-to-date period, WNS achieves a -28.48% return, which is significantly lower than AON's 22.58% return. Over the past 10 years, WNS has underperformed AON with an annualized return of 7.93%, while AON has yielded a comparatively higher 14.94% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WNS (Holdings) Limited (WNS) and Aon plc (AON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WNS Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the AON Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNS and AON, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

WNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%.

The maximum WNS drawdown since its inception was -90.63%, which is greater than AON's maximum drawdown of -67.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNS and AON. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

WNS (Holdings) Limited (WNS) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Aon plc (AON) at 4.38%. This indicates that WNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between WNS (Holdings) Limited and Aon plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.