WMTI vs. QQA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. WMTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.

Performance

WMTI vs. QQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 12.08% return.

WMTI

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -6.82%
• 6M: -5.95%
• YTD: -0.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQA

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -0.25%
• 6M: 10.17%
• YTD: 12.08%
• 1Y: 24.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMTI vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	-0.96%	9.99%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	12.08%	-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WMTI and QQA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	-0.09

Return for Risk

WMTI vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMTI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 67
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMTI vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WMTI	QQA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.67	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.76	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.52	—

Drawdowns

WMTI vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, roughly equal to the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and QQA.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMTI	QQA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.60%	-19.73%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.37%	-2.37%	-14.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.33%	-2.52%	-2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WMTI	QQA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.90%	14.51%	+13.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.90%	18.61%	+9.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.90%	18.61%	+9.29%

WMTI vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMTI vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison

WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.01%, more than QQA's 9.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.72%	9.78%	4.29%
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	26.01%	3.36%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMTI and QQA in my portfolio?

WMTI and QQA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WMTI or QQA?

On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WMTI or QQA?

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WMTI or QQA?

WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 26.01%, compared with 9.72% for QQA.

What is the main difference between WMTI and QQA?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.29% for QQA.