WMTI vs. HOOW
WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WMTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their -0.17 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
WMTI vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly higher than HOOW's -31.68% return.
WMTI
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HOOW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -27.79%
- 6M
- -20.03%
- YTD
- -31.68%
- 1Y
- -24.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.69M | $5.55M | $5.41M | |
| $616.62K | $528.80K | $959.03K |
WMTI vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | -4.04% | 9.99% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -31.68% | -28.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMTI and HOOW is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMTI vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank
WMTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HOOW
WMTI vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMTI | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMTI vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and HOOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMTI | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.47% | -65.74% | +44.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -65.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.97% | -53.60% | +34.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -31.15% | +24.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 40.51% | — |
Volatility
WMTI vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMTI | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 65.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.52% | 84.98% | -57.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 83.74% | -56.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 83.74% | -56.22% |
WMTI vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WMTI and HOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
WMTI vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison
WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.84%, less than HOOW's 167.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 167.55% | 67.92% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 28.84% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMTI and HOOW have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WMTI and HOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 167.55%, compared with 28.84% for WMTI.
WMTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for WMTI and HOOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer