WMTI vs. AMDW
WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.10 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
WMTI vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 146.74% return.
WMTI
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -9.07%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- 6M
- 119.90%
- YTD
- 146.74%
- 1Y
- 209.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 229.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.26M | $9.58M | $8.51M | |
| $616.62K | $528.80K | $959.03K |
WMTI vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | -4.04% | 9.99% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 146.74% | -21.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMTI and AMDW is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMTI vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank
WMTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMDW
WMTI vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMTI | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMTI vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMTI | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.47% | -34.64% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.97% | -21.39% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -13.97% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.59% | — |
Volatility
WMTI vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMTI | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 28.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 67.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.52% | 85.70% | -58.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 85.05% | -57.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.52% | 85.05% | -57.53% |
WMTI vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both WMTI and AMDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
WMTI vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.84%, less than AMDW's 53.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 53.42% | 34.78% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 28.84% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMTI and AMDW have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WMTI and AMDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 53.42%, compared with 28.84% for WMTI.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for WMTI and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer