WMT vs. SMR
WMT (Walmart Inc.) and SMR (NuScale Power Corporation) are both stocks. WMT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive), while SMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, WMT returned 22.42%/yr vs -0.32%/yr for SMR. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WMT vs. SMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMT achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -30.20% return.
WMT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.77%
SMR
- 1D
- 3.34%
- 1M
- -11.93%
- YTD
- -30.20%
- 6M
- -46.07%
- 1Y
- -74.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
WMT vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMT Walmart Inc. | 9.07% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | -3.19% |
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | -30.20% | -20.97% | 444.98% | -67.93% | 2.29% | -0.89% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMT and SMR is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.07 |
The correlation between WMT and SMR shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WMT:
$968.20B
SMR:
$3.16B
WMT:
$2.88
SMR:
-$2.02
WMT:
1.34
SMR:
104.42
WMT:
10.26
SMR:
2.71
WMT:
$725.31B
SMR:
$18.10M
WMT:
$181.16B
SMR:
$4.45M
WMT:
$44.32B
SMR:
-$696.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMT vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank
WMT
SMR
WMT vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMT | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.87 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | -0.91 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.82 | -1.32 | +7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMT vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMT drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, smaller than the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMT and SMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMT | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.14% | -87.47% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.75% | -82.86% | +67.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.93% | -82.86% | +60.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -87.47% | +61.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.81% | -81.49% | +71.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -35.08% | +20.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | 57.39% | -52.45% |
Volatility
WMT vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Walmart Inc. (WMT) is 9.86%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 28.93%. This indicates that WMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMT | SMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | 28.93% | -19.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.49% | 69.57% | -51.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.67% | 102.59% | -78.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 93.50% | -71.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 89.31% | -67.58% |
Dividends
WMT vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison
WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMR NuScale Power Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.80% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Financials
WMT vs. SMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Walmart Inc. and NuScale Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WMT and SMR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMR has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to WMT (9.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMT dropped -77.14% vs SMR's -87.47%.
WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMT and SMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer