WMT vs. SCHH
WMT (Walmart Inc.) is a stock, while SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) is REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. Over the past 10 years, WMT returned 19.77%/yr vs 4.51%/yr for SCHH. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WMT vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMT achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than SCHH's 16.33% return. Over the past 10 years, WMT has outperformed SCHH with an annualized return of 19.77%, while SCHH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.51% annualized return.
WMT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 28.71%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.77%
SCHH
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 16.33%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
WMT vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMT Walmart Inc. | 9.07% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 16.33% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMT and SCHH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.34 |
The correlation between WMT and SCHH shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMT vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank
WMT
SCHH
WMT vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMT | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 1.94 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.82 | 6.10 | -0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMT vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMT drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, which is greater than SCHH's maximum drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMT and SCHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMT | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.14% | -44.22% | -32.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.75% | -8.28% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.93% | -17.76% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -33.28% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.74% | -44.22% | +18.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.81% | 0.00% | -9.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -9.43% | -5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | 2.63% | +2.31% |
Volatility
WMT vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison
Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) at 4.83%. This indicates that WMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMT | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.86% | 4.83% | +5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.49% | 9.98% | +8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.67% | 13.56% | +10.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 18.74% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 20.99% | +0.74% |
Dividends
WMT vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison
WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than SCHH's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.69% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.80% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMT and SCHH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to SCHH (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMT dropped -77.14% vs SCHH's -44.22%.
WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMT and SCHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer