WMRIX vs. TRXAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

WMRIX (Wilmington Real Asset Fund) and TRXAX (Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, WMRIX returned 5.53%/yr vs 5.60%/yr for TRXAX. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WMRIX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for TRXAX.

Performance

WMRIX vs. TRXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMRIX achieves a 17.01% return, which is significantly higher than TRXAX's 5.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WMRIX having a 5.53% annualized return and TRXAX not far ahead at 5.60%.

WMRIX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 4.19%
• 6M: 9.61%
• YTD: 17.01%
• 1Y: 25.22%
• 3Y*: 10.64%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: 5.53%
• ALL TIME*: 6.48%

TRXAX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 1.56%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 1Y: 12.23%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: 5.60%
• ALL TIME*: 5.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

WMRIX vs. TRXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund	17.01%	12.79%	2.57%	1.12%	-8.03%	21.49%	-2.19%	16.85%	-7.21%	11.81%
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund	5.95%	16.16%	4.67%	5.23%	-7.44%	9.65%	3.62%	11.51%	-3.30%	11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between WMRIX and TRXAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2011	0.66

The correlation between WMRIX and TRXAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.66 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WMRIX vs. TRXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WMRIX

WMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
WMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
WMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
WMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
WMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
WMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

TRXAX

TRXAX Risk / Return Rank: 68
TRXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TRXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
TRXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TRXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TRXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WMRIX vs. TRXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WMRIX	TRXAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	1.82	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	2.60	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.33	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	2.13	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.12	6.80	+4.33

WMRIX vs. TRXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the TRXAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMRIX and TRXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WMRIX vs. TRXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMRIX drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, which is greater than TRXAX's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMRIX and TRXAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMRIX	TRXAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.84%	-20.50%	-17.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-5.60%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.95%	-6.04%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.03%	-16.03%	-6.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.27%	-20.50%	-10.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.03%	-1.76%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.15%	-2.65%	-4.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	1.75%	+0.35%

Volatility

WMRIX vs. TRXAX - Volatility Comparison

Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) at 1.86%. This indicates that WMRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMRIX	TRXAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	1.86%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.65%	5.28%	+1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.89%	6.55%	+2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.44%	7.86%	+3.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.51%	8.20%	+4.31%

WMRIX vs. TRXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMRIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than TRXAX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMRIX vs. TRXAX - Dividend Comparison

WMRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than TRXAX's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund	2.14%	2.45%	4.93%	5.12%	0.83%	6.76%	1.91%	2.66%	8.34%	3.46%	3.55%	1.59%
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund	6.09%	7.15%	1.02%	3.51%	6.07%	9.29%	1.99%	3.03%	2.84%	2.73%	0.00%	5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMRIX and TRXAX in my portfolio?

WMRIX and TRXAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WMRIX or TRXAX?

WMRIX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to TRXAX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMRIX dropped -37.84% vs TRXAX's -20.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WMRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.