WMRIX vs. GIMFX
WMRIX (Wilmington Real Asset Fund) and GIMFX (GMO Implementation Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, WMRIX returned 5.53%/yr vs 7.13%/yr for GIMFX. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WMRIX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GIMFX.
Performance
WMRIX vs. GIMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMRIX achieves a 17.01% return, which is significantly higher than GIMFX's 15.19% return. Over the past 10 years, WMRIX has underperformed GIMFX with an annualized return of 5.53%, while GIMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.13% annualized return.
WMRIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- YTD
- 17.01%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 10.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.48%
GIMFX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 29.39%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
WMRIX vs. GIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund | 17.01% | 12.79% | 2.57% | 1.12% | -8.03% | 21.49% | -2.19% | 16.85% | -7.21% | 11.81% |
GIMFX GMO Implementation Fund | 15.19% | 25.37% | 2.67% | 14.75% | -1.24% | 4.05% | -7.25% | 13.24% | -5.58% | 14.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMRIX and GIMFX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.60 |
The correlation between WMRIX and GIMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMRIX vs. GIMFX — Risk / Return Rank
WMRIX
GIMFX
WMRIX vs. GIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMRIX | GIMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.71 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 4.48 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.12 | 16.36 | -5.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMRIX vs. GIMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMRIX drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, which is greater than GIMFX's maximum drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMRIX and GIMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMRIX | GIMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.84% | -25.87% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -6.53% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.95% | -8.02% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.03% | -13.20% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.27% | -25.87% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | 0.00% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -4.26% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 1.78% | +0.32% |
Volatility
WMRIX vs. GIMFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) is 1.99%, while GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that WMRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMRIX | GIMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 2.23% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | 6.81% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 8.18% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.44% | 8.64% | +2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 8.94% | +3.57% |
WMRIX vs. GIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMRIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than GIMFX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMRIX vs. GIMFX - Dividend Comparison
WMRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, more than GIMFX's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIMFX GMO Implementation Fund | 4.28% | 4.28% | 3.39% | 5.93% | 3.59% | 3.28% | 2.25% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 2.95% | 1.98% | 0.00% |
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund | 6.09% | 7.15% | 1.02% | 3.51% | 6.07% | 9.29% | 1.99% | 3.03% | 2.84% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 5.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMRIX and GIMFX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIMFX has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to WMRIX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMRIX dropped -37.84% vs GIMFX's -25.87%.
GIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMRIX and GIMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer