PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FMILX vs. FBCVX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FMILXFBCVX
YTD Return30.48%11.76%
1Y Return36.08%20.33%
3Y Return (Ann)12.32%7.40%
5Y Return (Ann)11.79%8.61%
10Y Return (Ann)6.06%7.61%
Sharpe Ratio2.521.84
Sortino Ratio3.302.66
Omega Ratio1.471.32
Calmar Ratio3.553.85
Martin Ratio14.799.49
Ulcer Index2.44%2.12%
Daily Std Dev14.33%10.94%
Max Drawdown-56.03%-63.06%
Current Drawdown-0.35%-0.68%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between FMILX and FBCVX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FMILX vs. FBCVX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FMILX achieves a 30.48% return, which is significantly higher than FBCVX's 11.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FMILX has underperformed FBCVX with an annualized return of 6.06%, while FBCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.71%
4.11%
FMILX
FBCVX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMILX vs. FBCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMILX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCVX's 0.63% expense ratio.


FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBCVX: current value at 0.63% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.63%
Expense ratio chart for FMILX: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FMILX vs. FBCVX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMILX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FMILX, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FMILX, currently valued at 3.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FMILX, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FMILX, currently valued at 3.55, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.003.55
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FMILX, currently valued at 14.79, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.79
FBCVX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBCVX, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBCVX, currently valued at 2.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBCVX, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBCVX, currently valued at 3.85, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.003.85
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBCVX, currently valued at 9.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.49

FMILX vs. FBCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the FBCVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMILX and FBCVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.52
1.84
FMILX
FBCVX

Dividends

FMILX vs. FBCVX - Dividend Comparison

FMILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than FBCVX's 6.49% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FMILX
Fidelity New Millennium Fund
0.23%0.30%1.63%2.04%1.59%0.97%1.25%0.90%1.18%1.03%9.39%5.63%
FBCVX
Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund
6.49%1.53%1.07%1.26%1.07%1.48%1.62%1.09%1.05%1.77%1.39%0.60%

Drawdowns

FMILX vs. FBCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMILX drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, smaller than the maximum FBCVX drawdown of -63.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMILX and FBCVX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.35%
-0.68%
FMILX
FBCVX

Volatility

FMILX vs. FBCVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Value Fund (FBCVX) at 3.74%. This indicates that FMILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.03%
3.74%
FMILX
FBCVX