WMCVX vs. BIAUX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

WMCVX (Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund) and BIAUX (Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX returned 11.15%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for BIAUX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WMCVX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BIAUX.

Performance

WMCVX vs. BIAUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMCVX achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly lower than BIAUX's 17.46% return. Over the past 10 years, WMCVX has outperformed BIAUX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while BIAUX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.52% annualized return.

WMCVX

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: 3.90%
• YTD: 12.95%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 15.49%
• 3Y*: 14.13%
• 5Y*: 5.04%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

BIAUX

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 17.46%
• 6M: 15.01%
• 1Y: 32.16%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: 10.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMCVX vs. BIAUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund	12.95%	-3.66%	11.65%	31.78%	-21.61%	25.23%	12.52%	23.63%	-9.55%	19.54%
BIAUX Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund	17.46%	5.71%	11.73%	16.16%	-8.74%	31.11%	-5.69%	29.85%	-13.48%	12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between WMCVX and BIAUX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009	0.92

The correlation between WMCVX and BIAUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WMCVX vs. BIAUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMCVX

WMCVX Risk / Return Rank: 15
WMCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
WMCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
WMCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
WMCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
WMCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

BIAUX

BIAUX Risk / Return Rank: 66
BIAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BIAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
BIAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BIAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BIAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMCVX vs. BIAUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) and Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WMCVX	BIAUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.84	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	2.73	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.32	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	3.80	-2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.38	11.10	-7.72

WMCVX vs. BIAUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMCVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the BIAUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMCVX and BIAUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WMCVX vs. BIAUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.79%, which is greater than BIAUX's maximum drawdown of -45.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMCVX and BIAUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMCVX	BIAUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.79%	-45.55%	-20.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.06%	-8.22%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.75%	-25.16%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.26%	-25.16%	-7.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.29%	-45.55%	-0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	0.00%	-2.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-6.17%	-4.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.34%	2.81%	+1.53%

Volatility

WMCVX vs. BIAUX - Volatility Comparison

Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund (WMCVX) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX) at 4.32%. This indicates that WMCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMCVX	BIAUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.33%	4.32%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.90%	11.39%	+2.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.90%	16.99%	+1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.58%	19.77%	+2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.48%	21.54%	+1.94%

WMCVX vs. BIAUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMCVX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAUX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMCVX vs. BIAUX - Dividend Comparison

WMCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, less than BIAUX's 11.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAUX Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund	11.48%	13.49%	16.54%	5.94%	6.16%	0.48%	0.47%	9.38%	14.31%	4.11%	0.34%	2.41%
WMCVX Wasatch Small Cap Value Fund	5.48%	6.19%	17.18%	3.67%	2.39%	7.72%	0.00%	1.10%	8.98%	6.63%	0.07%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMCVX and BIAUX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, WMCVX and BIAUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, WMCVX or BIAUX?

WMCVX has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to BIAUX (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMCVX dropped -65.79% vs BIAUX's -45.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIAUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.