PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAUX vs. BIAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAUX vs. BIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX) and Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAUX achieves a 11.88% return, which is significantly higher than BIAGX's 10.00% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAUX has underperformed BIAGX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while BIAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return.


BIAUX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
11.88%
6M
12.78%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
9.79%

BIAGX

1D
2.17%
1M
10.37%
YTD
10.00%
6M
5.86%
1Y
7.48%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAUX vs. BIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIAUX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund
11.88%5.71%11.73%16.16%-8.74%31.11%-5.69%29.85%-13.48%12.17%
BIAGX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund
10.00%0.61%16.60%33.90%-33.60%18.56%32.41%47.97%4.66%30.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAUX and BIAGX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.71

The correlation between BIAUX and BIAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAUX vs. BIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAUX
BIAUX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BIAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BIAGX
BIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAUX vs. BIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX) and Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIAUXBIAGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

0.54

+1.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

0.83

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.10

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

0.39

+3.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.15

0.96

+9.19

BIAUX vs. BIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the BIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAUX and BIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIAUXBIAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

0.54

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.11

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.37

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.29

+0.31

Drawdowns

BIAUX vs. BIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAUX drawdown since its inception was -45.55%, smaller than the maximum BIAGX drawdown of -56.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAUX and BIAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAUXBIAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.55%

-56.68%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.22%

-20.56%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-56.68%

+31.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-56.68%

+31.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.55%

-56.68%

+11.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-42.40%

+40.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-14.98%

+8.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

8.39%

-5.57%

Volatility

BIAUX vs. BIAGX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund (BIAUX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX) at 3.62%. This indicates that BIAUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAUXBIAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.62%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

11.74%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

14.83%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

47.25%

-27.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.56%

36.35%

-14.79%

BIAUX vs. BIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAUX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIAUX vs. BIAGX - Dividend Comparison

BIAUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.05%, less than BIAGX's 78.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAGX
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund
78.64%86.50%91.52%6.80%7.75%13.04%4.95%9.82%12.64%8.09%9.13%6.59%
BIAUX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fundamental Value Fund
12.05%13.49%16.54%5.94%6.16%0.48%0.47%9.38%14.31%4.11%0.34%2.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIAUX and BIAGX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIAUX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to BIAGX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAUX dropped -45.55% vs BIAGX's -56.68%.

BIAUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAUX and BIAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer