WMBFX vs. VTMFX
WMBFX (Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, WMBFX returned 5.77%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for VTMFX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WMBFX charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTMFX.
Performance
WMBFX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMBFX achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, WMBFX has underperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 5.77%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
WMBFX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 16.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.77%
VTMFX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 14.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
WMBFX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMBFX Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund | 7.59% | 11.39% | 6.59% | 9.45% | -15.07% | 7.64% | 14.95% | 13.72% | -5.67% | 10.27% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 5.23% | 11.28% | 12.17% | 15.55% | -12.69% | 13.10% | 13.31% | 18.01% | -1.40% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMBFX and VTMFX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.88 |
The correlation between WMBFX and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMBFX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
WMBFX
VTMFX
WMBFX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMBFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 2.91 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 13.60 | -1.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMBFX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMBFX drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, smaller than the maximum VTMFX drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMBFX and VTMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMBFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -28.49% | +9.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.26% | -5.38% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.57% | -10.61% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.15% | -17.40% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.15% | -21.87% | +2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.75% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -3.54% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.40% | 1.15% | +0.25% |
Volatility
WMBFX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund (WMBFX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.45%. This indicates that WMBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMBFX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 2.45% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.07% | 5.18% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 6.46% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.63% | 8.57% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.25% | 9.15% | -1.90% |
WMBFX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMBFX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMBFX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison
WMBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than VTMFX's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 1.94% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 1.72% | 2.05% | 2.22% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
WMBFX Allspring Spectrum Conservative Growth Fund | 2.04% | 2.20% | 1.97% | 2.60% | 5.57% | 9.26% | 9.32% | 2.29% | 8.93% | 9.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMBFX and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMBFX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to VTMFX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMBFX dropped -19.15% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.
VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WMBFX and VTMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer