WM vs. SCCO
WM (Waste Management, Inc.) and SCCO (Southern Copper Corporation) are both stocks. WM operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while SCCO operates in Copper (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, WM returned 15.28%/yr vs 27.23%/yr for SCCO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WM vs. SCCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WM achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than SCCO's 38.49% return. Over the past 10 years, WM has underperformed SCCO with an annualized return of 15.28%, while SCCO has yielded a comparatively higher 27.23% annualized return.
WM
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- 1Y
- -6.80%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
SCCO
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- 38.49%
- 6M
- 38.12%
- 1Y
- 116.65%
- 3Y*
- 44.16%
- 5Y*
- 32.01%
- 10Y*
- 27.23%
WM vs. SCCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WM Waste Management, Inc. | -0.44% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 43.82% | 5.46% | 30.45% | 5.32% | 24.46% |
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 38.49% | 66.62% | 9.45% | 50.12% | 4.25% | -0.62% | 58.79% | 46.59% | -33.11% | 50.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between WM and SCCO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1996 | 0.20 |
The correlation between WM and SCCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WM:
$87.73B
SCCO:
$158.77B
WM:
$6.91
SCCO:
$6.04
WM:
31.40
SCCO:
32.01
WM:
2.57
SCCO:
4.41
WM:
3.45
SCCO:
10.92
WM:
8.75
SCCO:
13.47
WM:
$25.41B
SCCO:
$14.55B
WM:
$5.61B
SCCO:
$6.04B
WM:
$6.96B
SCCO:
$8.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WM vs. SCCO — Risk / Return Rank
WM
SCCO
WM vs. SCCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WM | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 3.88 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 11.04 | -11.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WM vs. SCCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WM drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, roughly equal to the maximum SCCO drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WM and SCCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WM | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.85% | -78.60% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.70% | -30.22% | +13.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -39.69% | +21.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | -43.07% | +24.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.07% | -54.83% | +24.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.26% | -10.36% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.68% | -22.04% | +4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.59% | 10.61% | -3.02% |
Volatility
WM vs. SCCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) is 6.15%, while Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) has a volatility of 20.20%. This indicates that WM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WM | SCCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 20.20% | -14.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.06% | 41.61% | -27.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.06% | 49.75% | -30.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 39.94% | -21.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 37.55% | -18.01% |
Dividends
WM vs. SCCO - Dividend Comparison
WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than SCCO's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 1.89% | 2.13% | 2.29% | 4.65% | 5.80% | 5.19% | 2.30% | 4.81% | 4.55% | 1.24% | 0.56% | 1.30% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.63% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Financials
WM vs. SCCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waste Management, Inc. and Southern Copper Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WM vs. SCCO - Profitability Comparison
WM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SCCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.
SCCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 2.48B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.3%.
WM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 723.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
SCCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in a net margin of 37.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WM and SCCO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCCO has higher volatility (20.20%) compared to WM (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WM dropped -77.85% vs SCCO's -78.60%.
SCCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WM and SCCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer