SCCO vs. RIO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO).

Performance

SCCO vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SCCO vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation	25.63%	66.62%	9.45%	50.12%	4.25%	-0.62%	58.79%	46.59%	-33.11%	50.79%
RIO Rio Tinto Group	21.78%	44.47%	-15.36%	11.06%	18.48%	-3.67%	36.22%	33.18%	-2.93%	44.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SCCO : $149.16B RIO : $155.34B
EPS SCCO : $5.27 RIO : $13.11
PE Ratio SCCO : 33.78 RIO : 7.23
PS Ratio SCCO : 10.91 RIO : 1.39
PB Ratio SCCO : 13.51 RIO : 2.50
Total Revenue (TTM) SCCO : $13.42B RIO : $111.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) SCCO : $5.21B RIO : $31.10B
EBITDA (TTM) SCCO : $7.28B RIO : $40.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCCO achieves a 25.63% return, which is significantly higher than RIO's 21.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SCCO has outperformed RIO with an annualized return of 25.57%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.89% annualized return.

SCCO

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: -18.69%
• YTD: 25.63%
• 6M: 49.11%
• 1Y: 101.72%
• 3Y*: 39.02%
• 5Y*: 27.08%
• 10Y*: 25.57%

RIO

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 21.78%
• 6M: 47.02%
• 1Y: 65.74%
• 3Y*: 18.46%
• 5Y*: 11.95%
• 10Y*: 20.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SCCO vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCCO

SCCO Risk / Return Rank: 88
SCCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SCCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SCCO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SCCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SCCO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

RIO

RIO Risk / Return Rank: 91
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCCO vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCCO	RIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.35	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.92	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.39	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	4.36	-0.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.52	14.45	-1.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCCO vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCCO Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCCO and RIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCCO	RIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.35	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.41	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70	0.68	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.33	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between SCCO and RIO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SCCO vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

SCCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than RIO's 4.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation	1.89%	2.13%	2.29%	4.65%	5.80%	5.19%	2.30%	4.81%	4.55%	1.24%	0.56%	1.30%
RIO Rio Tinto Group	4.24%	4.66%	7.40%	5.40%	10.48%	10.23%	5.13%	7.68%	6.32%	4.47%	3.93%	7.58%

Drawdowns

SCCO vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCCO drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCO and RIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCCO	RIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.60%	-88.97%	+10.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.22%	-15.19%	-15.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.07%	-36.97%	-6.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.83%	-37.47%	-17.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.69%	-3.29%	-15.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.09%	-23.88%	+1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.20%	4.58%	+3.62%

Volatility

SCCO vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 10.28%. This indicates that SCCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCCO	RIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.30%	10.28%	+9.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.75%	20.88%	+16.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.11%	28.16%	+19.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.28%	29.07%	+10.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.89%	30.93%	+5.96%

Financials

SCCO vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Southern Copper Corporation and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SCCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

SCCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 2.11B and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

SCCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 1.31B and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in a net margin of 33.8%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.