PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WM vs. AXP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WM vs. AXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and American Express Company (AXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WM achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly higher than AXP's -15.13% return. Over the past 10 years, WM has underperformed AXP with an annualized return of 15.25%, while AXP has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.


WM

1D
-1.93%
1M
0.79%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
3.67%
1Y
-7.08%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
15.25%

AXP

1D
0.53%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-15.13%
6M
-13.33%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
18.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WM vs. AXP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
-0.81%10.50%14.28%16.20%-4.49%43.82%5.46%30.45%5.32%24.46%
AXP
American Express Company
-15.13%25.99%60.32%28.67%-8.52%36.88%-1.14%32.52%-2.62%36.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WM and AXP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1991

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between WM and AXP has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WM:

$87.41B

AXP:

$214.24B

EPS

WM:

$6.91

AXP:

$16.23

PE Ratio

WM:

31.28

AXP:

19.25

PEG Ratio

WM:

2.56

AXP:

1.64

PS Ratio

WM:

3.44

AXP:

2.62

PB Ratio

WM:

8.72

AXP:

6.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

WM:

$25.41B

AXP:

$82.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WM:

$5.61B

AXP:

$68.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

WM:

$6.96B

AXP:

$18.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WM vs. AXP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AXP
AXP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXP Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WM vs. AXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and American Express Company (AXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMAXPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.05

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

0.18

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.95

0.40

-1.34

WM vs. AXP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WM Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the AXP Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WM and AXP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMAXPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

0.17

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.52

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.59

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.29

+0.07

Drawdowns

WM vs. AXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WM drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, smaller than the maximum AXP drawdown of -83.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WM and AXP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMAXPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.85%

-83.91%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.72%

-23.90%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-28.76%

+10.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

-31.55%

+13.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.07%

-49.64%

+19.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.59%

-18.42%

+6.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.69%

-22.05%

+4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.49%

10.96%

-3.47%

Volatility

WM vs. AXP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) is 5.91%, while American Express Company (AXP) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that WM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMAXPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.91%

6.27%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

20.03%

-6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.73%

26.27%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

29.49%

-10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

31.83%

-12.32%

Dividends

WM vs. AXP - Dividend Comparison

WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than AXP's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AXP
American Express Company
1.09%0.85%0.91%1.24%1.35%1.05%1.42%1.29%1.51%1.32%1.61%1.58%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.64%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%

Financials

WM vs. AXP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waste Management, Inc. and American Express Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
6.23B
20.88B
(WM) Total Revenue
(AXP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WM vs. AXP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Waste Management, Inc. and American Express Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
84.6%
Portfolio components
WM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AXP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Express Company reported a gross profit of 17.66B and revenue of 20.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

WM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.

AXP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Express Company reported an operating income of 6.60B and revenue of 20.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

WM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 723.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

AXP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Express Company reported a net income of 2.97B and revenue of 20.88B, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WM and AXP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AXP has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to WM (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WM dropped -77.85% vs AXP's -83.91%.

AXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WM and AXP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer